Visa Lawyer Blog

Despite that fact that the law is written broadly enough that most foreigners from the developing world could be refused for a visitor’s visa as “intending immigrants,” non-immigrant visa issuance rates are still shockingly high. In 2007, 74 percent of the more than five million foreign nationals who applied for visitor’s visas were approved. This figure is particularly startling when one considers that citizens from the world’s most prosperous countries — including most of Western Europe, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand — do not need visitor’s visas to enter the United States. Two-thirds of Mexican applicants were issued visitor’s (B1/B2) visas (or border crossing cards), four-fifths of Chinese applicants were issued visas, 88 percent of Russians were granted visas, and more than half of Haitian and Dominican applicants were successful.

Still, More than a decade after the federal government strengthened travel requirements after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, foreign visitors say getting a temporary visa remains a daunting and sometimes insurmountable hurdle.

The tourism industry hopes to change that with a campaign to persuade Congress to overhaul the State Department's tourist visa application process.

Tourism leaders said the decline in foreign visitors over the past decade is costing American businesses and workers $859 billion in untapped revenue and at least half a million potential jobs at a time when the slowly recovering economy needs both.

While the State Department has beefed up tourist services in recent years, reducing wait times significantly for would-be visitors will likely be a challenge as officials try to balance terrorist threats and illegal immigration with tight budgets that limit hiring.

Nearly 7.6 million nonimmigrant visas were issued in 2001, compared with fewer than 6.5 million in 2010. The number of visa applicants also dropped sharply after 2001. Those combined forces pushed the U.S. share of global travelers down to 12 percent last year, from 17 percent before 2001.

The proposed immigration overhaul has largely been driven by the U.S. Travel Association, the tourism industry's lobbying giant, and has been endorsed by business titans such as the National Retail Federation, Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts, and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts. Republicans and Democrats in Congress are backing the proposed changes through six bills in the House and Senate.

Geoff Freeman, the travel association's chief operating officer, said the State Department should be required to keep visa interview wait times at a maximum of 10 days.

We agree that there should be a better system in place, that will streamline the process of issuing visitor visas from US Consulates worldwide. Consuls, should apply more reasonable standards when interviewing candidates. If we close our doors and make the process of getting the visa a nightmare, they will find another country to spend their money at, and will not be coming back.

Read more here...

Now the J1 Visa is on the spot, and for a reason. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has ordered an "extensive and thorough review" of a foreign exchange program that has been used by U.S. businesses as a source of cheap labor and exploited by criminals to import women to work in the sex industry.

The J1 Work & Travel Program offers overseas university exchange students a challenging opportunity to intimately experience life and culture in the U.S. during their summer holiday period.

Work & Travel J1 provides international university students the chance to work at entry-level, seasonal jobs in the United States for up to 4 months on a J-1 Visa. Participants are entitled to work, earn money and travel at the end of the work assignment.

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee also has been gathering information on the J-1 visa, which was created in 1963 to allow college students from other countries to spend their summer breaks living, working and traveling in the U.S.

As the program has grown to bring more than 100,000 young people here annually, it has become as much about money as cultural understanding.

The State Department has made several changes since an Associated Press investigation last year uncovered widespread abuses, including living and working conditions that some participants compared to indentured servitude. In one of the worst cases, a woman told the AP she was beaten, raped and forced to work as a stripper in Detroit after being promised a job as a waitress in Virginia.

The reforms being considered by the State Department would limit and refine the types of jobs students can have, expand the list of prohibited employment categories, and strengthen the "the cultural aspects of the program to ensure that the objective of the program - positive exposure to the United States - is accomplished."

The agency already prohibits participants from taking jobs "that might bring the Department of State into notoriety or disrepute" but the AP found that strip clubs and adult entertainment companies openly solicited J-1 workers.

Critics say the students have gotten little help from companies designated as sponsors by the State Department. We hope that the third party sponsor will take a more active role in making sure j1 students are safe in the hands of employers during the J1 work period.

A new report out today says more than 700,000 foreign students came to the U.S. to study last year. That's a record high for U.S. colleges and universities. Why the influx? It has a lot to do with state budgets.

The F1 visa is a nonimmigrant visa for international students who are qualified to attend a full course of study at colleges, universities, conservatories, academic high schools (subject to strict regulations) and institutions with language-training programs in the U.S.

Guess who sent the most students to the US in 2011 - China.

The annual Open Doors report from the Institute of International Education says the number of Chinese students on U.S. campuses was up 22 percent last school year.

Allan Goodman is president of the Institute. He says international students pump more than $21 billion into the U.S. economy. They often pay full tuition, and universities hit by state budget cuts say that's one reason they're recruiting more foreign students. Read more from NPR.

We expect more students to come in 2012 and we hope US Consulate and Embassies worldwide will also make it a smooth process to actually get visas. The benefits are both for the US economy and for the students in the US gaining an amazing opportunity to be part of the global market place.

Recently, many employers have been receiving Requests for Evidence (RFEs) on their petitions for L-1B Specialized Knowledge nonimmigrant worker visa. The L-1B visa is filed by a company who wants to transfer someone with specialized knowledge of the company or product of the company to their U.S. branch to help with its operations. Because of so many RFEs sent to employers on their L-1B petitions, the United States Citizen and Immigration Services held a stakeholder meeting to address the issues related to L-1B filings. In particular, many attorneys for employers raised the issue concerning the factors in determining Specialized Knowledge. At our law firm, we received an RFE for our own L-1B case that raised many of the same issues other attorneys have faced in their filings. This article will address those issues and how we overcame them in our case.

The main issue being the L-1B visa is the specialized knowledge requirement. Specialized knowledge means special knowledge possessed by an individual of the petitioning organization’s product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management or other interests and its application in international markets, or an advanced level of knowledge or expertise in the organization’s processes and procedures (8 C.F.R. 214.2(l)(1)(ii)(D and (E)). From this definition of specialized knowledge, the application of it has varied greatly in many cases. First, what constitutes special knowledge seems to be confused with the standard of the O-1 visa requirements. The O-1 visa requires the individual to hold extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics where “extraordinary ability” means sustaining national or international acclaim. This standard confuses the meaning of someone simply having an advanced level of knowledge or expertise within their organization’s processes and procedures.

In answering how our client's employee held the specialized knowledge for the position he was being transferred to, we had to go back through the description of the position held in the foreign company and the position going to be held in the U.S. After going through those descriptions, we responded to each duty in both positions to show how the specialized knowledge of the employee was required for both positions. We further confirmed that knowledge through use of many letters of reference from higher up executives and other individuals who recognized the employee's importance within the organization.

There has been some indication that specialized knowledge is different from proprietary knowledge and should not be confused. Some attorneys reminded USCIS that the L-1B nonimmigrant classification did not require the individual to be extraordinary, and that specialized knowledge need not be proprietary. It has pointed out that specialized knowledge is a special knowledge of the product or processes of a company. It was also stated that specialized knowledge need not to be narrowly held by a select few individuals within a company. These concerns were raised in our own case wherein it was requested to show how the employee held proprietary knowledge of the company's product. Although there is nothing in the definition of the L-1B visa that says proprietary knowledge is required to show specialized knowledge, nevertheless, by providing other documentation to show how the employee was directly involved in the development of the company's product, it was indisputable that he held specialized knowledge within the company.

Another issue raised was that skilled individuals required to keep the company competitive in the field were becoming difficult to bring over with RFEs in these cases. In cases where the knowledge relates to the industry rather than a particular company or it is not unique to the company, but rather enhances a company’s competitiveness, the importance of the individual’s skilled work cannot be understated. It was noted that in certain industries such as the software industry, the information is not unique to the company in that there are other individuals who have knowledge of the software as well. All of these considerations make it clear that a specialized knowledge individual is the one whose knowledge makes the company more competitive in its field. This RFE was also asked for in our case and easily responded to through statements from the senior executives of the company attesting to how the employee's use in the U.S. will make the company more competitive.

Continue reading "L1B Visa Attorney - Difficulties with the L-1B Specialized Knowledge Visa" »

Since he arrived in this country two decades ago, Chef Jose Andres has been a tireless advocate for Spanish cuisine. His D.C.-based restaurants helped popularize tapas, the small plates that typify Spanish food. He is also a model and inspiration to many aspiring Chef immigrants looking to move to the US and start their restaurants.

Although many Hospitality workers wait months or even years for permission to live and work in the US legally, a small but growing number have found a legal path that is relatively simple and fast: come with money to buy a businesses here. As the Hospitality business is booming in the US, more and more Hospitality professionals in Europe are coming to the US and starting their own businesses via the E2 visa investment.

This is also known as the nonimmigrant investor visa. It is a temporary category that is granted in two-year to five year increments with no limits on the number of extensions.

A recent Newsweek article features Chef Jose Andres and he explains his favorite mistake in business, that mistake was the beginning of his American adventure and his success.

"...So there I am in the middle of Spain, it’s raining, and I’m out of a job at a place I thought I would spend my entire career. The soundtrack of my life started playing. It was like those movies where there’s a shooting and someone’s little brother is shot in slow motion. I was just standing there in the rain, cars driving by. Within a week, I moved to New York to try something different. I had never thought about trying to be a chef in America, but I thought now was the right time, and I didn’t have any other choices. That was 20 years ago, and moving to the United States really was destined for me. America gave me the opportunity to open successful restaurants, start a TV show, and write books. I can even fill an auditorium when I give a speech, which in America is rare for a chef.

Maybe the mistake was leaving to find a pay phone. Or maybe it was his mistake for not believing me. It’s still my favorite."

The E-2 visa is beneficial to many who wish to work and conduct business in the U.S. It is not limited to just the owners of companies, but may be used by their managers and specialized knowledge workers. The process for obtaining an E-2 is complex and should not be attempted without a qualified immigration lawyer. Feel free to contact us with any questions.

When you are traveling to the United States for the first time you are likely to have questions and concerns about what happens when you arrive at the Port-of-Entry?

A foreign national traveling to the United States will arrive initially at a U.S. “Port-of-Entry" (POE). The POE can be an airport, a land border crossing, or a seaport. Passing through a Port-of-Entry generally means that you are seeking permission from an Immigration Inspector, an official of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), to enter the U.S. for a specific reason, purpose and duration, which are generally always predefined.

We have posted below a recent CBP Muster on the Basic Elements of a Thorough Primary Inspection for the benefit of our readers.

The Department of State (DOS) has launched the anticipated new version of the Form DS-160 Nonimmigrant Visa Application.

The form's new version clarifies, in no uncertain terms, that the applicant - and no one else - must electronically sign and submit the DS-160 form. As part of a newly formatted opening page, the DS-160 advises applicants to:

"be aware that under U.S. law you must electronically sign and submit your own application unless you qualify for an exception. This means that you (the applicant) must check the 'Sign Application' button, even if someone else helped you fill the application out."

To emphasize the point, the DOS even adds the following language to the above warning:

"If someone else clicks the button instead of you, your application may not be accepted."

This same warning is repeated several times throughout the DS-160 and the associated Confirmation page.

Other changes on the new form include six new questions relating to possible grounds of inadmissibility.

The Work & Travel Program is part of the J-1 visa category of the U.S. government’s Exchange Visitor program.

If you are a university student from outside the United States and are not a U.S. citizen, you may experience life in the U.S. as a temporary employee and tourist by participating in a Work & Travel Program during your four-month college vacation period.

How? Your first step is to obtain a J-1 visa, which is the U.S. government’s exchange visitor visa program designed to promote cross-cultural exchange between the US and other countries. To qualify for this J-1 visa, you must be a full-time university student or be within six months of graduation.

The Summer Work Travel (SWT) program has provided thousands of international college and university students an opportunity to visit the United States and experience the American people and culture firsthand.

In 2010, approximately 120,000 college and university students participated in the Summer Work Travel program.

Given the expanding size of this program, the Department of State has perceived the need to enhance safeguards for participants. The implementation of these safeguards should provide stronger protections and make this a more viable program. New regulations were announced this week.

The new safeguards include:

* ­ A pilot program for six countries (Belarus, Bulgaria, Moldova, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine) aimed at thwarting the potential for abuse of summer work travel participants who come from those countries; and new program-wide regulations designed to strengthen and clarify current program oversight and administration requirements.

* ­ A special e-mail address and a toll-free telephone number, available 24 hours a day/7 days a week, to enable students to have ready, direct contact with the Department about program complaints or issues; and,

* ­ Department of State welcome letters and program brochures provided to each program participant to better inform them about what to expect in the Summer Work Travel program.

* ­ An aggressive and proactive system to monitor sponsors better, including on-going data analysis, complaint tracking, and on-site visits to sponsors to fully assess their compliance and the effectiveness of the new regulations.

* ­ Closer scrutiny to visa applications of potential SWT program participants from the pilot program countries. Consular officers refuse visas to those applicants who don’t demonstrate that they are eligible for visas, including compliance with the pilot program’s conditions.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (Act) provides for the admission of different classes of nonimmigrants who are foreign nationals seeking temporary admission to the United States. The purpose of the nonimmigrant’s intended stay in the United States determines his or her proper nonimmigrant classification. Some classifications permit the nonimmigrant’s spouse and qualifying children to accompany the nonimmigrant to the United States or to join the nonimmigrant here. To qualify, a child must be unmarried and under the age of 21.

F-1 nonimmigrants, as defined in section 101(a)(15)(F) of the Act, are foreign students coming to the United States to pursue a full course of academic study in SEVP-approved schools. An F-2 nonimmigrant is a foreign national who is the spouse or qualifying child of an F-1 student.

M-1 nonimmigrants, as defined in section 101(a)(15)(M) of the Act, are foreign nationals pursuing a full course of study at an SEVP-approved vocational or other recognized nonacademic institution (other than in language training programs) in the United States. An M-2 nonimmigrant is a foreign national who is the spouse or qualifying child of an M-1 student.

SEVP is the DHS program that administers SEVIS. It ensures that government agencies have essential data related to nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors to preserve national security. SEVP provides approval and oversight to schools authorized to enroll F and M nonimmigrant students and gives guidance to both schools and students about the requirements for maintenance of their status.

ICE SEVP I-17 FAQs provide information for schools about SEVP certification, including background on SEVP and SEVIS, SEVP certification basics, an overview of the SEVP certification process, preparing the petition for SEVP certification, and preparing for a site visit.

Click here for more info for Schools

This was long overdue but here are the latest on the Tri Valley story. A federal grand jury here has indicted the president of a Pleasanton, Calif., university on 33-criminal counts, charging her with an array of violations, including visa fraud, money laundering and alien harboring, as a result of a two-year investigation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).

Tri-Valley University President Susan Xiao-Ping Su, 41, who also served as the school's chief executive officer, is accused of engaging in a two-year scheme to defraud the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by submitting phony documents in support of Tri-Valley University's applications to admit foreign nationals on student visas. The indictment further alleges that after obtaining such approvals, Su fraudulently issued visa-related documents to student aliens in exchange for "tuition and fees."

Su was taken into custody Monday morning at her Pleasanton, Calif., home by HSI special agents. She made her initial appearance here in federal court shortly after her arrest.

In carrying out the scheme, Su is accused of making multiple false representations to DHS through Tri-Valley University's use of the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), which the U.S. government uses to monitor the "F-1" student visa program. Through her false representations, Su was able to unlawfully obtain and issue F-1 visa-related documents without regard to the students' academic qualifications or intent to pursue a course of study required to maintain a lawful immigration status.

According to the indictment, Su admitted and maintained foreign students in exchange for tuition and other payments. In furtherance of the F-1 visa scheme, Su also allegedly harbored multiple Tri-Valley University student-employees to assist her in making the false representations to SEVIS. The indictment further alleges the defendant engaged in multiple money laundering transactions totaling more than $3.2 million using proceeds she derived from the visa fraud scheme.

Read more..

The Department of State (DOS) has issued a regulation that broadens the authority of consular officers to revoke a visa at any time subsequent to issuance of the visa, including when the individual is already in the U.S. Additionally, the regulation allows consular officers and designated officials within DOS to revoke a visa provisionally while considering a final visa revocation.

This rule is effective April 27, 2011. DOS did not issue the regulation through notice and comment rulemaking on the basis that it involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is exempt from those procedures.

Pursuant to section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), DOS may determine that a visa should be revoked when information reveals that the applicant was originally, or has since become, ineligible or may be ineligible to possess a U.S. visa. In testimony before Congress in 2004, DOS stated that it had revoked 1,250 visas since September 11, 2001, based on information suggesting possible terrorist activities or links. Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have put pressure on DOS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to improve their policies regarding visa revocations.

If DOS revokes an individual’s visa, the information will be uploaded into the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) database and the foreign national may not use the visa for travel to the U.S. Though DOS will seek to notify the traveler, the revocation is effective irrespective of whether the foreign traveler knows about the revocation.

Separately, the INA allows the government to remove (i.e. deport) an individual whose nonimmigrant visa has been revoked under section 221(i). There is no judicial review of the decision to revoke the visa, but there is judicial review in the context of a removal proceeding if the visa revocation is the sole basis for removal.

Expect more denials at the port of entry to the US by individuals not aware that their visa has been revoked. I understand the need for more security but this may not be the way to go.

In general, any person holding a B1 or B1/B2 visa may be eligible to perform H-1B work in the United States as long as they fulfill the following criteria:

-Hold the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor’s degree

- Plan to perform H-1B-caliber work or training

- Will be paid only by their foreign employer, except reimbursement of incidental travel costs such as housing and per diem. The employee must not receive any salary from a U.S. source.

-The task can be accomplished in a short period of time.

These travelers would be admitted as B1 visitors, and may only stay in the U.S. for the time allotted by the Department of Homeland Security upon entry. Like any other B1/B2 applicant, travelers must still show strong professional, familial and financial or other ties, which indicate a strong inducement to return to the country of origin or another country other than the United States.

Consulate Generals worldwide are prepared to issue B1/B2 visas to qualified applicants for this purpose. These visas may also be used for tourism. Current holders of B1/B2 visas may already use this provision without seeking another visa.

Having said that, abuse in the B1 in lieu is on the rise, therefore the recent proposal from Senator Grassley is not surprising.

Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa has asked the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to investigate the current use of the B-1 Business Visitor and B-1 in lieu of H-1B visa programs. In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, Senator Grassley expressed his concern that companies are using the B-1 business visa in order to circumvent the numerical limit and the prevailing wage requirements of the H-1B visa program.

Specifically, he cites a formal complaint that has been filed against a company in an Alabama Circuit Court alleging that the company brings low-level, unskilled foreign workers as B-1 business visitors to work in full-time positions in violation of the immigration laws under the guise of attending business meetings.

Senator Grassley asked the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to provide, among other things, information regarding the number of B-1 in lieu of H-1B visas issued each year for the past five years, the consular posts that issued such visas, the employers that are using these visas, the lengths of time the visa holders remain in the United States, the ways in which the Department of State verifies an employer's claim about the B-1 visa holder's activities while in the United States, and the actions taken against employers that abuse the B-1 visa program. Senator Grassley also requested that the B-1 in lieu of H-1B program be reviewed, and he questioned whether the visa category should be eliminated entirely.

We have been processing B1 visas for legitimate employers with global operations. The concern is that now there will be increased pressure on Consular officers to reject more B1 applicants, this will make it tougher for legitimate US employers to conduct business in the international market place.

A recent new Bill S. 823 would permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on valid visas as nonimmigrant elementary and secondary school students to attend public schools in the United States for longer than 1 year if such aliens reimburse the local educational agency that administers the school for the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing education at such school for the period of the alien's attendance.

Under current laws, there are limitations and requirements related to foreign (F-1) students attending public secondary/high schools (grades nine through twelve), under U.S. law. Student F-1 visas cannot be issued to persons seeking to enter the United States in order to attend a public primary/elementary school or a publicly funded adult education program.

Dependents of a nonimmigrant visa holder of any type, including F-1, are not prohibited from attendance at either a public primary school, an adult education program, or another public educational institution, as appropriate.

The current law does not allow a student in F-1 status to attend public secondary school without paying tuition. The student must pay the full, unsubsidized per capita (for each student) cost of education in all cases.

We will keep you posted as new information becomes available on this Bill.

Birth Tourism is a hot topic right now. How do I know? Reporters keep calling me asking about this topic with great interest.

The latest story was covered by the daily. The Daily is new type of media exclusively created for the ipad and provides cutting edge news with amazing content delivery. You have to try it to appreciate.

The latest story that I was part of is about Mothers coming to America to give birth. Millions of foreign tourists visit the United States every year, and a growing number return home with a brand new U.S. citizen in tow. Every year millions of foreign tourists visit the United States, and a growing number return home, after having given birth to a new baby.

Eight percent of all babies born in the U.S. in 2008 were to illegal immigrant parents, according to a groundbreaking analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data by the Pew Hispanic Center. All of those children are U.S. citizens while their parents remain undocumented.

Thousands of legal immigrants, who do not permanently reside in the United States but give birth here, have given their children the gift of citizenship, which the U.S. grants to anyone born on its soil.

The number of U.S. births to non-resident mothers rose 53 percent between 2000 and 2010, according to the most recent data from the National Center for Health Statistics. Total births rose 5 percent in the same period. Among the foreigners who have given birth here, including international travelers passing through and foreign students studying at U.S. universities, are "birth tourists," women who travel to the United States with the explicit purpose of obtaining citizenship for their child.

Catering to the women is a nascent industry of travel agencies and hotel chains seeking to profit from the business.

Is this just a trend or a growing reality, share your thoughts with us.

Read our commentary at the daily.com

U nonimmigrant derivatives may apply to extend status with the VSC when the status was initially granted for less than the three years required for adjustment of status under INA §245(m).

Although the regulations at 8 CFR §214.14(g)(2) contemplate extensions of U derivative status in cases where the derivative is outside the United States and is unable to enter in a timely manner due to consular processing delays, the regulations are silent about extensions of status for U derivatives in other situations.

USCIS has clarified that extensions of status are also warranted where the derivative's U nonimmigrant adjudication was delayed, resulting in an initial grant of status for less than three years. Because adjustment of status under INA §245(m) requires that the applicant have U status for at least three years, this resulted in some derivatives being ineligible to adjust. The policy memorandum clarifies that VSC can consider delays other than those related to consular processing as a basis for extending U derivative status.

The request for an extension of status should be made using form I-539 and filed with the VSC regardless of geographical jurisdiction. The application should include:

* the filing fee or documented request for a fee waiver,
* evidence of the principal's and derivative's U status,
* evidence of the principal's adjustment of status (if applicable),
* evidence of the derivative's relationship to the principal, and
* the applicant's statement regarding why the extension is needed.

We all know by now about the Pleasanton university that catered to mostly online students is being called a sham by federal prosecutors who say the university was a front to illegally provide immigration status to foreign nationals.

The complaint, filed by the U.S. District Attorney's Office, claims Ms. Su the founder, was part of an elaborate scheme to defraud, using false statements and misrepresentations to the Department of Homeland Security.

According to the complaint, Su and Tri-Valley University have made millions of dollars in tuition fees for issuing the visa-related documents, enabling foreign nationals to obtain illegal student immigration status.

We have seen several students here in San Diego that were issued notices to appear by ICE and are trying to help them resolve this issue by negotiating with ICE as well as trying to see who can be reinstated.

We now have the response from Tri Valley University to share. Tri-Valley University (TVU) letter written by its President regarding ICE’s decision to withdraw the school’s SEVIS approval. The letter, which has been redacted, includes responses to the unresolved issues listed in the SEVP Notice of Intent to Withdraw letter.

When it comes to the Visa Waiver program, clients often ask me, what happens when a Visa Waiver traveler who is in the U.S. visits a third, non-adjacent country, and then seeks to return to the U.S.? Do they receive a new 90-day period upon re-entering the United States? What if they go to Mexico or Canada or another adjacent country?

According to the CBP, An alien admitted into the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) who departs to visit a third country other than contiguous territory or an adjacent island and then returns to the United States to apply for admission as a temporary visitor for business or pleasure under the VWP, would receive a new 90-period of admission if he is found to be admissible.

If the same alien traveled only to foreign contiguous territory or an adjacent island, he would generally be readmitted for the balance of his original period of admission if found to be admissible. An alien is this situation may request to be admitted for a new 90-day period and be admitted for that new period if slbe is found to be admissible.

Please note that any VWP applicant for admission must establish his admissibility to the satisfaction of the inspecting CBP officers. An alien seeking a new 90-day period of admission under the VWP after departing the United States to "visit" a third country should expect to undergo greater scrutiny than most other VWP applicants. So this is possible but expect a tough time trying to get back in.

Beginning January 10, 2011, the U.S. Embassy and Consulates in Mexico will process visas differently. Under the new procedures, most applicants will go to Applicant Service Centers (ASCs) prior to their consular section interview. The ASC staff will collect the applicant’s biometric information that will be reviewed by the consular section prior to the applicant’s interview. ASCs will be located in buildings separate from the U.S. Embassy and Consulates.

The new process will provide several advantages to applicants:

*
Total visa application costs will go down. Applicants will no longer pay one fee to obtain information and schedule the appointment, another fee for the visa application, and a third fee for courier service. Instead, they will pay only one application fee that will cover the appointment, application, and courier fees. The current application fee will stay the same: USD140 for a tourist application, USD150 for petition-based cases (including temporary worker visas), and USD390 for treaty-trader and investor visas.
*
Many applicants who are renewing their visas will no longer require an interview with a consular officer. These applicants can simply visit the nearest ASC in order to submit application documents and provide fingerprints. See the links below for more information on the Interview Waiver Program.
*
Because the collection of biometric information will take place at the ASC, applicants who are required to visit both the ASC and the consular section should spend less time at the consular section than they have had to in the past.
*
Applicants at the U.S. Consulates in Ciudad Juarez, Monterrey, and Nuevo Laredo will no longer pay a USD26 surcharge.

What is the new process for applying for a nonimmigrant visa to the United States?

Before applicants can schedule an appointment, they will be required to complete the DS-160 online application and pay the visa application fee (MRV fee). If the applicant chooses to pay the MRV fee at Banamex or Scotiabank, each applicant will print a deposit slip with the correct amount of the MRV fee and the applicant’s receipt number.

The MRV fee can also be paid by credit card through the appointment website or by telephone. The appointment website will be available soon. Whether the applicant schedules an appointment through the web site or through the call center, the DS-160 nonimmigrant visa application form bar code number and the MRV receipt number will be collected prior to the scheduling of the appropriate appointment for the ASC as well as the consular section appointment, if required.

During the scheduling process, applicants will have an opportunity to choose a convenient DHL location to pick up their passports with the approved visa.

How will the new process work?

* Before making an appointment online or contacting the Call Center to make an appointment, applicants will download a deposit slip and pay the visa application fee at any Banamex or Scotiabank location. The fee can also be paid online or by telephone using a credit card.

Continue reading "B2 Non Immigrant Visas - Embassy of the US in Mexico City Issued FAQs on New NIV Procedures" »

Client just called and asked for a change of status from B2 visitor to F1 student. I said, great we can help, but when does your status expire. He said, no worries I am good for 10 years!!! Been here for 4 only.

I said: No you are not, the I-94 (little white card in the passport) is what controls your status, this only good for 6 months max. I heard a loud sound of falling and silence. For those who are in the U.S. temporarily as nonimmigrants, the most important date to track is perhaps the expiration date of their I-94 arrival / departure cards. The I-94 is a small card that is usually stapled into one's passport. It is obtained in one of two ways. It can be issued by a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer at the port of entry upon arrival in the United States. It can also be issued by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) when one is granted an extension or change of nonimmigrant status from within the United States.

The I-94 card reflects how long one is permitted to stay in the United States, provided s/he complies with the terms of her/his status. Occasionally, the CBP or USCIS will issue an I-94 card with an erroneous date (either issuing an approval for a longer period than is permitted by law or granting an individual less time than appropriate.) In either case, one should immediately obtain competent legal advice on the proper steps to correct the error.

One should never rely upon an erroneous grant of more time in a nonimmigrant category than was requested or than one is eligible to receive. So if you are pending change of status for 2 years, it does not mean that you are legal for 2 years.

It is important to remember that the expiration date on a visa stamp in the passport and the expiration date on the I-94 card are often not the same. The visa is an entry document, only. The time that one is actually allowed to remain in the United States after an entry could be much shorter or longer than the duration of the visa.

The appropriate amount of time is determined by the CBP at the port of entry. This is based on applicable law as well as the CBP's discretion.

The number of Chinese students studying in the United States surged 30 percent in the 2009-10 academic year, making China, for the first time, the top country of origin for international students, according to “Open Doors,” the Institute of International Education’s annual report.

The report found that a record high of 690,923 international students came to the United States last year — nearly 128,000 of them, or more than 18 percent, from China. Over all, the number of international students at colleges and universities in the United States increased 3 percent for the 2009-10 academic year. India, which in recent years had been in the top spot, increased its numbers only slightly, to 104,897 last academic year.

But not all countries sent more students to the United States last year. The number coming from Japan declined 15 percent, and Mexico, Indonesia and Kenya each sent 7 percent to 9 percent fewer students than in the previous year.

Read the NY Times article here

Watch our Video on F1 and M1 visas here