May 15, 2008

San Diego Immigration Lawyer - Another Local Restaurant Raided by ICE

The recent number of raids, arrests, and criminal indictments against employers for worksite violations across the State by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) branch of the Department of Homeland Security are clear indications that employers are on the frontline of the government’s efforts to stop illegal immigration.

Today Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents executed a criminal search warrant at a popular Pacific Beach bakery and restaurant, The French Gourmet, and have taken workers suspected of being illegally in the country into custody. I actually like the place and often get baked goods for the weekend. Recent raids against employers believed to have unauthorized workers have been based on ongoing criminal investigations by ICE. ICE has arrived at worksites with both criminal and civil warrants. It has searched businesses, frozen bank accounts, and arrested not only employees but also employers. I can only wonder why this little place was targeted and investigated. Read the Story here

So what can I advice the Owners of the French Gourmet?

Under IRCA, employers must complete Form I-9, Employment Eligibility and Verification, for all employees hired after November 6, 1986. ICE is authorized to conduct investigations to determine whether employers have knowingly employed unauthorized workers and failed to properly complete, present, or retain the Form I-9 for newly hired employees. An ICE investigation nearly always involve the examination of the employer’s I-9 files, even though the I-9s may not be the target of its investigation. In fact, ICE has recently hired forensic auditors to focus on I-9 enforcement.

To ensure compliance with the I-9 requirements under IRCA, a company should establish an I-9 policy that includes:

* The proper and timely completion and retention of Form I-9 for all employees hired after November 6, 1986;
* Zero-tolerance for the employment of individuals who do not provide the proper identity and employment eligibility documents for Form I-9;
* A tickler system for I-9s that require reverification;
* I-9 training for all company representatives who are part of the recruitment, orientation, and hiring processes for the company; and
* Regularly scheduled in-house I-9 audits.

Conducting self-audits puts a company in better position if it becomes the subject of an ICE investigation. While employers cannot verify whether documents used for employment authorization are authentic, self-audits establish good-faith compliance.

Best Tip for employers:

Personnel should be instructed not to provide any documentation or information to ICE unless there is a warrant issued, and to do so under the supervision of legal counsel. Note that ICE is required to give three-days notice before an I-9 audit, unless it presents a search warrant or subpoena.

May 4, 2008

San Diego Immigration Lawyer - Immigrants rights

We had a busy week at the firm. In addition to the regular case load, we prepared for two immigration presentations. Earlier this week I presented to the Women in Science Association in San Diego, an association of scientists and researchers. We discussed the different ways they can obtain permanent residency based on their unique skills and education. Clearly, if such immigrants would like to stay, the system is very welcoming.

Later this week, I have spoken to a very different group also very much eager to find ways to stay in the US. I have given a workshop to an Hispanic community base organization here in town, helping their members obtain information on becoming Citizens and in many cases becoming legal in the US. The group consisted of hard working undocumented workers and family members, as well as long term Permanent Residents seeking to become Citizens.

We discussed various legal options, but I heard a lot of complaints about the governments treatment of the illegal population. Systematic raids of residential places by ICE, inhuman treatment of detained illegal immigrants, discrimination at work and more.

Just today the Union Tribune covered the poor detention conditions of immigrant detainees at prvate detention facilities in San Diego. In the past year, ICE and its contractors have come under fire for alleged mistreatment of immigrants. In San Diego last year, the American Civil Liberties Union twice sued the agency and CCA.

One lawsuit alleged overcrowding at the Otay Mesa facility, with three detainees housed in cells designed for two. The other alleged inadequate medical care, with detainees complaining of being denied treatment or waiting months for it.

While we are happy the highly skilled immigrants get the best options to stay, the US Immigration system and its officials should change they way they treat illegal immigrants and those that are trying to work with the system

Read the Union Tribune Story here

April 1, 2008

San Diego Immigration Lawyer - Mexicans deported will get free trip home

The latest from the Border. Mexican nationals who are deported from the United States or leave voluntarily after being stopped are being offered free trips back to their hometowns under a pilot program launched yesterday in Tijuana.

The Tijuana program, dubbed Humanitarian Repatriation, will also ensure that returning Mexicans receive shelter, food, emergency medical care and temporary employment upon their return to Mexico.

Read more

March 24, 2008

Marriage and Adjustment of Status Interview - When USCIS agents go bad....

I recently posted an article about what is actually happening at a Marriage based adjustment interview Read here But it seems that from time to time, innocent immigrants may face unethical, criminally motivated immigration agents that take advantage of their position to exploit immigrants. We as lawyers make sure to follow our clients' cases from early document preparation stages to the final interview and beyond. We make sure that stories like the one you are about to read will never happen.

This is a story of a bad agent pursuing a young immigrant after her marriage interview with the spouse. The calls from the agent started three days later. He hinted, she said, at his power to derail her life and deport her relatives. He called her to a private meeting. And at noon on Dec. 21, in a parked car on Queens Boulevard, he named his price — not realizing that she was recording everything on the cellphone in her purse.
“I want sex,” he said on the recording. “One or two times. That’s all.

Read the story here

We expect the agency to create a system to root out these bad apples and protect the innocent immigrants. One of the advantages of hiring a lawyer to assist and be present the interview is to make sure that you will get the best treatment from the government at all times. If not, we are here to respond.

March 2, 2008

San Diego Immigration Attorney Jacob Sapochnick discussed I-601 Extreme Hardship Waivers on Talk Radio 1170 AM

As some of you may know, immigrants who entered the country illegally without a visa or without inspection may not seek Green Cards (Permanent residency) from inside the United States. Even if they have a U.S. citizen spouse or parent to petition for them, it will be difficult unless the pending petition was filed before April 30,2001 (when the Section 245i law was still active). Instead, they must leave the United States to obtain an immigrant visa at a consulate abroad. But once they leave the country, they generally trigger a three-year or 10-year bar to re-entering the country.

This was the topic of my most recent radio interview, where I discussed the above referenced issue with two of my clients present in the studio with me. The wife, who was brought illegally to the the US at the age of 5, hoped to obtain permanent residence based on her marriage to a U.S. citizen, but has to return to her home country to apply for an immigrant visa because of her unlawful entry into the United States. We prepared the I-601 waiver application for her and established, among other factors, that her husband will suffer extreme hardship if his wife is not allowed to return. Her I-601 application will be reviewed in April and we will keep our readers and radio listeners posted.

Listen to the show here

February 28, 2008

San Diego Immigration Lawyer - Marriage Visa - Adjustment of Status Interview inside report

Many of our marriage visa clients and prospective clients, often want to know what actually happens at the final Marriage adjustment of status Interview. I try to describe and explain as best as I can, and often wish I could actually record the interview, but of course we are not allowed. So I have decided to take one of my Law Clerks, Andrea with me to one of the interviews. At the conclusion of the interview, she wrote in detail the sequence of events:

The immigration office in Chula Vista opens at 7:00am. Even that early on a Thursday morning there is already a long line at the door. Since our client has an appointment, we are able to walk right in after first showing identification and passing through security. The office itself is bright and bustling with televisions showing the news and signs in different languages on the walls. There is an edge of nervousness in the air as people apply for or wait on the results of their visa and citizenship applications.
As we sit in the waiting area, the attorney prepares his client for her interview. She has applied for a green card based on her marriage to an American citizen. This interview will determine whether she is approved or denied. The attorney explains what the interview will be like and what types of questions the interviewer will ask. Most of the questions will be about the couple’s marriage and relationship. It is important for the interviewer to see that the marriage is based on a real relationship, and is not just a scheme to obtain citizenship. One last check to make sure all the documents are in order, and we are called to the interview room.

Our interviewer has a reputation for toughness. He is stern, direct and gets straight to the point. He asks for documents showing evidence of the couple’s shared life, in this case a bank statement from a joint account. He asks for photos of the couple’s wedding, one photo of the priest performing the ceremony and one group shot of the whole family. He staples the photos into his file with the rest of the documents. The interview itself has two parts. For the first part, the interviewer asks specific questions to both husband and wife. How did you two meet? Where did you go on your first date? When did you move in together? How did you propose to her? He asks the husband, “How do you plan to support your wife?” and looks over financial documents.

Continue reading "San Diego Immigration Lawyer - Marriage Visa - Adjustment of Status Interview inside report" »

February 27, 2008

San Diego Immigration - Lou Dobbs v. ADL

immigration Daily, published a great comment about Lou Dobbs' recent episode with the ADL, he may be picking the wrong group to mess with.....


CNN's Lou Dobbs latest racist behavior resulted in his calling
the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) "a joke" and labeling the Anti-
Defamation League (ADL) as "absolute advocate group[] for open
borders and amnesty for illegal aliens". His latest actions
attack the ADL, an organization founded in 1913 to "to stop the
defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair
treatment to all" and go beyond his usual rantings against pro-
immigrationists. Mr. Dobb's latest tirade against the ADL could
be his death knell since he has taken on America's Jewish
community. In response, the American Jewish Committee press release
http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=849241&ct=5031777
denounced media's recent treatment of immigrants, including Mr.
Dobbs's show. It is Mr. Dobbs who is a joke, not ADL.

This is Lou...


January 13, 2008

San Diego Immigration Lawyer on Talk Radio KCBQ

On January 8, 2008, I appeared on the Rick Amato Show on radio station KCBQ 1170AM. Based in San Diego, California, The Rick Amato Show broadcasts from The Edge of America™. The Show exposes issues, raises awareness and often makes a difference in the lives of people during times of injustice. I will be the regular legal analyst on immigration issues on this show and will appear on a monthly basis or as issues arise. I am excited to be part of this great Talk Show.

Rick Amato and I spent the first hour of the show (almost, you can skip the first 5 minutes) talking about immigration law, the H2B visas crisis and the New Hampshire primary. I discussed the impact of Immigration on the elections and how the different candidates view the immigration issues. Listen to the podcast from the link Below.

Click Here to listen

Here is a link to the Written article about the show

December 31, 2007

Happy New Year 2008!

Dear Readers,

It is time to think positive thoughts for 2008 and beyond. So, here is a warm wish for you and your loved ones the very best in the New Year.

Yours,

Jacob

December 20, 2007

San Diego Immigration Law - New Deportation rules update

Last month ICE issued a new directive relating to detained arriving aliens who are found to have a credible fear by an Immigration Judge or USCIS officer.

The new policy can be found on AILA's website: AILA Doc. No. 07111264 (Nov. 12, 2007).

The new policy implements a two-part analysis for making parole determination as they relate to detained arriving aliens who are found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture by an Immigration Judge or USCIS officer only. Step one of the analysis includes establishing identity, flight risk and danger to the community. The directive indicates which documents will be acceptable including a valid government issued document and affidavits from third parties. Step two is an "assessment of whether the alien has established that he or she falls within one or more of the five categories" in 8 CFR section 212.5(b).

After the deportation officer completes the Record of Determination/Parole Determination Worksheet it will then be reviewed by supervisor and field officer before a final determination is made. The Officer in Charge no longer has the authority to make the parole determination alone.