Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Immigrant Visas

by

gdj-july-4-8043756_1280We are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the July 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of July, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

   Highlights of the July 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of July?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

EB-1 Aliens of extraordinary ability, Outstanding Professors and Researchers, and Certain Multinational Managers or Executives

  • EB-1 China will advance 2 months to July 1, 2023
  • EB-1 India will retrogress 2 months to October 15, 2022

EB-2 Members of the Professions and Aliens of Exceptional Ability

  • EB-2 India will be unavailable

EB-3 Professionals and Skilled Workers

  • EB-3 India will advance 2.4 weeks to January 1, 2014
  • EB-3 China will advance 4.7 months to December 22, 2021
  • (Worldwide and Mexico) will advance 2 months to August 1, 2024

EB-3 Other Workers

  • EB-3 India will advance 2.4 weeks to January 1, 2014
  • EB-3 Philippines will advance 1 month to December 1, 2021
  • (Worldwide, Mexico) will advance 1 month to March 1, 2022

EB-4 Special Immigrants and Religious Workers

  • All countries will advance 2 months to September 15, 2022

Continue reading

by

katie-moum-7XGtYefMXiQ-unsplash-scaledGood news for green card applicants impacted by the 39-country ban.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed that it has resumed processing immigration applications for nationals from 39 countries after a federal court ordered the agency to halt policies that had frozen adjudications for months.

However, the government has already filed an appeal, meaning the future of these cases remains uncertain.

The case, Dorcas v. USCIS, challenged several USCIS policies that had suspended the processing of green card applications, work permits, naturalization applications, and certain asylum cases for individuals from designated countries. A federal judge ruled that these policies were unlawful and ordered USCIS to resume normal processing.

Importantly, the court’s decision requires USCIS to process applications, not automatically approve them. Applicants must still meet all eligibility requirements under existing immigration laws. Additionally, separate travel restrictions and other immigration policies remain in effect.

Continue reading

by

succo-hammer-1675156_1280In another rapid development surrounding the controversial $100,000 H-1B consular processing fee, a federal court has temporarily allowed U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to continue collecting the fee while the government’s appeal moves forward.

Employers and foreign workers should prepare for continued uncertainty as the litigation unfolds.

What Happened?

On June 8, 2026, a federal district court in Massachusetts struck down USCIS’s implementation of the $100,000 H-1B fee, finding significant legal issues with the policy. However, just four days later, on June 12, 2026, the same court temporarily paused its ruling after the government filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

As a result, USCIS currently retains the authority to continue collecting the $100,000 fee for qualifying H-1B petitions involving consular notification while the appellate court reviews the case.

The government must formally request a stay from the First Circuit by June 18, 2026, for the temporary reinstatement to remain in effect.

The appeal is pending in State of California, et al. v. Mullin, et al., No. 26-1699 (1st Cir. June 12, 2026).

Continue reading

by

the-now-time-KXUKLB-_Sb0-unsplash-1-scaledOn Friday, June 5, a federal judge struck down several Trump administration immigration policies that targeted asylum seekers and halted the processing of immigration benefit applications for individuals from 39 countries, finding that the administration had exceeded its legal authority.

Last year, the administration paused asylum case processing and suspended immigration benefit applications for affected individuals subject to the travel ban for an undetermined period of time, leaving millions of immigrants across the United States facing uncertainty about their legal status.

In a lengthy 135-page court opinion, Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell found that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) acted unlawfully by implementing broad restrictions without authorization from Congress or established regulations. The court concluded that the policy unfairly targeted applicants based on their country of origin and violated federal immigration and administrative law.

The opinion comes after several plaintiff organizations including Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island and Refugee Dream Center filed a lawsuit in federal court arguing that thousands of individuals were prevented from obtaining lawful immigration benefits despite meeting eligibility requirements. The ruling reinforces the principle that immigration agencies must follow existing law and cannot create sweeping restrictions without proper legal authority.

Continue reading

by

markus-spiske-RX-BevgxSXs-unsplash-scaledIn a policy memorandum released today, just ahead of the Memorial Day holiday, the Trump administration announced that temporary visa holders seeking green cards should leave the United States and complete their immigration process through consular processing in their home countries.

But is adjustment of status completely off the table? No. While the government has made clear that individuals intending to immigrate to the United States are generally expected to pursue immigrant visas abroad, adjustment of status remains a discretionary pathway to a green card.

When deciding whether to exercise discretion to grant adjustment of status in the United States, USCIS officers will apply a “totality of the circumstances” analysis, weighing both favorable and unfavorable factors before reaching a decision.

Overview

For decades, Adjustment of Status has been one of the most reliable pathways to apply for a green card for immigrants already living in the U.S., who entered the country lawfully. This process has involved filing the I-485, remaining in the country while the green card case is pending, waiting for an interview, and receiving a final approval.

The ability to apply for adjustment of status has not been taken away with today’s announcement, however, the sense of security that applicants once had has been blurred.

The Policy Memorandum

In its policy memorandum, the government stressed that individuals admitted to the United States on temporary visas (tourist, student, work visas, etc.) are generally expected to leave the country rather than pursue Adjustment of Status from inside the U.S.

Instead, those wishing to remain in the U.S. permanently are expected to apply for an immigrant visa from abroad. But today’s announcement does not prevent those who qualify from seeking adjustment of status, although applicants should exercise greater caution and understand that certain factors may negatively affect their chances of approval.

Continue reading

by

vilkasss-ai-generated-8894582-scaledU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is reportedly increasing scrutiny of EB-5 immigrant investor applications filed by individuals with ties to certain Chinese technology companies and institutions.

Recent cases suggest that adjudicators are looking beyond traditional EB-5 requirements—such as lawful source of funds and job creation—and are instead placing greater emphasis on national security concerns, including potential connections to Chinese companies involved in telecommunications, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data infrastructure.

Applicants who have worked for or are affiliated with major firms and universities associated with China’s tech ecosystem may face additional background checks and requests for detailed disclosures about their employment history, organizational roles, and any perceived government or military links.

Continue reading

by

elin-melaas-rAfpEO53684-unsplash-scaledWe are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the June 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of June, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

   Highlights of the June 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of June?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

EB-1 Aliens of extraordinary ability, Outstanding Professors and Researchers, and Certain Multinational Managers or Executives

  • EB-1 India will retrogress 3.5 months to December 15, 2022
  • Except China, all other countries remain current

EB-2 Members of the Professions and Aliens of Exceptional Ability

  • EB-2 India will retrogress 10.4 months to September 1, 2013
  • Except China, all other countries remain current

Continue reading

by

fernandozhiminaicela-stethoscope-4280497-scaled

The Trump administration has quietly reversed a policy that threatened the jobs and immigration status of thousands of foreign doctors working in the United States.

Doctors from countries impacted by the administration’s expanded travel ban will once again be allowed to continue processing visa applications, work permits, and green card cases.

Earlier this year, the Department of Homeland Security implemented a freeze on immigration benefits for nationals from 39 countries. The policy placed many foreign physicians in legal limbo, forcing some hospitals to place doctors on administrative leave while others faced the possibility of losing their ability to work entirely.

The administration has now confirmed that applications associated with medical physicians will continue processing, exempting doctors from the immigration freeze. The change was made quietly, without a formal public announcement.

The update appeared on the USCIS webpage outlining its enhanced screening and vetting procedures which now indicates doctors are no longer subject to adjudicative processing holds:

“Internal Review Process

USCIS established an internal process for lifting holds on individual or group cases, requiring comprehensive review by multiple offices. Holds have been lifted for aliens vetted through Operation PARRIS, certain petitions filed by U.S. citizens, intercountry adoption forms, certain rescheduled oath ceremonies, statutory and regulatory decision issuance, refugee registrations for South African citizens/nationals, certain special immigrant visa petitions, certain employment authorization documents, and asylum applications from non high-risk countries, and applications associated with medical physicians….”

Continue reading

by

noupload-fingerprint-2108872

USCIS is expected to pause or delay adjudication of certain immigration benefit requests that require fingerprint-based background checks following the agency’s implementation of a new enhanced FBI security vetting process.

The new process became effective on April 27, 2026.

According to reports, USCIS officers have been directed to submit pending applications for enhanced FBI background checks and to withhold final adjudication until the required security clearances are completed.

The initial group of impacted cases is expected to include applications for which fingerprints were already collected and submitted before April 27, 2026.

At a Glance

Applications requiring fingerprint-based background checks may be subject to an adjudication pause for enhanced security checks, based on new USCIS internal guidance

Affected case types are expected to include adjustment of status, asylum, naturalization, family-based green card sponsorship petitions, and other immigration benefit requests requiring biometrics (fingerprints).

For pending cases where fingerprints were submitted before April 27, USCIS officers are expected to re-submit the fingerprints already on file through the new FBI system. Applicants generally should not be required to take further action unless specifically instructed by USCIS.

Newly filed cases received after April 27 may also be placed in a processing queue while USCIS works through the backlog of pending cases requiring re-vetting. At this time, one reported exception appears to be U.S. citizenship applications where oath ceremonies have already been scheduled.

Continue reading

by

publicdomainpictures-passport-315266_1920According to a recent New York Times article, the Justice Department is reportedly preparing to expand efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans, identifying 384 people whose citizenship it may try to revoke.

These cases may be assigned to prosecutors across 39 U.S. attorney’s offices, which could mean a sharp increase in denaturalization cases.

What’s Denaturalization?

Continue reading