Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Policies

by

mohamed_hassan-programming-9199585_1280The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is moving forward with a new proposal that could eliminate the 60-day grace period currently available to certain employment-based nonimmigrant workers after their employment ends.

On August 6, 2026, DHS submitted a proposed rule titled “Eliminating the Discretionary 60-day Grace Period” to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The proposal has not yet taken effect, and the full text has not yet been released.

What Is the Current 60-Day Grace Period?

Under current regulations, certain nonimmigrant workers whose employment ends before their authorized stay expires may receive a grace period of up to 60 consecutive days, or until the expiration of their authorized stay, whichever comes first.

The protection currently applies to workers in the following classifications:

  • E-1
  • E-2
  • E-3
  • H-1B
  • H-1B1
  • L-1
  • O-1
  • TN

Their dependent family members are also covered by the provision.

The 60-day grace period gives workers valuable time after losing or leaving a job to find another employer, seek a change or extension of immigration status, or prepare to leave the United States. Workers generally cannot continue working during the grace period unless they have another independent basis for employment authorization.

Continue reading

by

elisariva-hammer-3183166-scaledYesterday, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration’s policy pausing immigrant visa approvals for nationals of 75 countries violates federal immigration law.

The State Department introduced the policy in January 2026, directing consular officers to refuse covered immigrant visa applications while the government developed additional screening procedures concerning whether applicants might become dependent on public benefits.

The freeze affected primarily family-based applicants, along with some employment- and investment-based applicants.

Continue reading

by

tilixia-summer-money-8023328-scaledThe Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that it is rescinding the public charge regulation that has been in place since December 2022.

The change will take effect on September 18, 2026. Until then, the current 2022 rule remains in effect.

What Is the Public Charge Rule?

The public charge rule allows immigration officers to consider whether certain applicants are likely to become financially dependent on the government in the future.

The rule generally applies to:

  • Certain people applying for a green card from inside the United States;
  • Certain people applying for an immigrant visa at a U.S. embassy or consulate; and
  • Some nonimmigrants in limited circumstances.

A public charge finding may result in the denial of an immigration application.

What Is Changing?

DHS is removing the detailed public charge standards established by the 2022 rule.

The government is not replacing the 2022 rule with another detailed regulation. Instead, USCIS will rely on:

  • The Immigration and Nationality Act;
  • New USCIS policy guidance;
  • The applicant’s individual circumstances; and
  • The immigration officer’s discretion.

This means USCIS officers may have more flexibility when deciding whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge.

Continue reading

by

update-1672346_1920

On July 10, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued new employment-authorization guidance, affecting certain Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries from Haiti, Burma, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

The guidance was released shortly before the affected employment-authorization dates were scheduled to expire. Under the updated USCIS instructions, covered Haitian TPS beneficiaries have employment authorization through July 24, 2026. Covered beneficiaries from the other six countries have employment authorization through July 17, 2026. The temporary extensions affect hundreds of thousands of workers.

Updated employment-authorization dates

TPS country Updated USCIS expiration date
Haiti                                 July 24, 2026
Burma (Myanmar)                                 July 17, 2026
Ethiopia                                 July 17, 2026
Somalia                                 July 17, 2026
South Sudan                                 July 17, 2026
Syria                                 July 17, 2026
Yemen                                 July 17, 2026

TPS beneficiaries affected by these developments should immediately consult with a qualified immigration attorney to evaluate whether they may qualify for another lawful immigration status or form of relief.

Continue reading

by

brittani-burns-98uYQ-KupiE-unsplash-scaled

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court terminated Haiti and Syria’s TPS status on June 25th
  • Approximately, 350,000 individuals will lose their work authorization and be subject to removal
  • Affected individuals must seek alternative legal status immediately to avoid removal proceedings once the transition period ends.

On July 1, 2026, DHS and USCIS set a temporary expiration date of July 10, 2026 for work permits held by Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries from seven countries (Haiti, Syria, Burma, Yemen, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Somalia), after a Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for the government to end those protections.

On June 25th the Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can move forward with ending TPS for certain countries specifically Haiti and Syria even while other smaller legal battles about those terminations continue in lower courts.

Although the deadline for some countries could still be extended while lower court cases continue, DHS has described any continued relief as temporary.

Continue reading

by

jorono-flag-2693195-scaledOn June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for more than 350,000 people from Haiti and Syria who have been legally living and working in the United States.

Although the ruling directly affects only TPS holders from Haiti and Syria, its impact could reach much further.

The decision may have consequences for the broader TPS program, which currently protects about 1.3 million people from more than a dozen countries.

What is TPS

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a temporary immigration protection that allows people from certain countries to live and work legally in the United States, when it is unsafe for them to return home because of conditions like war, natural disasters, or major political instability.

The federal government determines which countries qualify for TPS and decides whether conditions in those countries justify renewing their designation.

The Ruling

The case, Mullin v. Doe, written by Justice Alito, held that courts do not have authority to review an administration’s decision to terminate TPS for a particular country. The court also rejected a constitutional claim brought by Haitian TPS holders, who argued that Haiti’s designation was ended because of racial bias. The court found that the evidence was not enough to show that racism played a motivating role in the decision.

Continue reading

by

katie-moum-7XGtYefMXiQ-unsplash-scaledGood news for green card applicants impacted by the 39-country ban.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has confirmed that it has resumed processing immigration applications for nationals from 39 countries after a federal court ordered the agency to halt policies that had frozen adjudications for months.

However, the government has already filed an appeal, meaning the future of these cases remains uncertain.

The case, Dorcas v. USCIS, challenged several USCIS policies that had suspended the processing of green card applications, work permits, naturalization applications, and certain asylum cases for individuals from designated countries. A federal judge ruled that these policies were unlawful and ordered USCIS to resume normal processing.

Importantly, the court’s decision requires USCIS to process applications, not automatically approve them. Applicants must still meet all eligibility requirements under existing immigration laws. Additionally, separate travel restrictions and other immigration policies remain in effect.

Continue reading

by

roszie-termination-7386579-scaledThe Department of Homeland Security has published a new proposed rule making it more difficult for certain noncitizens to obtain and maintain work authorization in the United States.

The proposal would affect humanitarian parolees, certain recipients of deferred action, individuals with final removal orders, and other noncitizens who currently qualify for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs).

The proposal would also make it more difficult for applicants with criminal histories, arrests, or admissions of criminal conduct to obtain work authorization, unless there are significant public-interest factors that justify a favorable exercise of discretion, such as cooperation with law enforcement.

If implemented, the changes would represent a significant shift away from broad access to employment authorization and toward a more restrictive, discretionary system. Many immigrants who rely on work permits to support themselves and their families could face increased uncertainty.

Continue reading

by

markus-spiske-RX-BevgxSXs-unsplash-scaledIn a policy memorandum released today, just ahead of the Memorial Day holiday, the Trump administration announced that temporary visa holders seeking green cards should leave the United States and complete their immigration process through consular processing in their home countries.

But is adjustment of status completely off the table? No. While the government has made clear that individuals intending to immigrate to the United States are generally expected to pursue immigrant visas abroad, adjustment of status remains a discretionary pathway to a green card.

When deciding whether to exercise discretion to grant adjustment of status in the United States, USCIS officers will apply a “totality of the circumstances” analysis, weighing both favorable and unfavorable factors before reaching a decision.

Overview

For decades, Adjustment of Status has been one of the most reliable pathways to apply for a green card for immigrants already living in the U.S., who entered the country lawfully. This process has involved filing the I-485, remaining in the country while the green card case is pending, waiting for an interview, and receiving a final approval.

The ability to apply for adjustment of status has not been taken away with today’s announcement, however, the sense of security that applicants once had has been blurred.

The Policy Memorandum

In its policy memorandum, the government stressed that individuals admitted to the United States on temporary visas (tourist, student, work visas, etc.) are generally expected to leave the country rather than pursue Adjustment of Status from inside the U.S.

Instead, those wishing to remain in the U.S. permanently are expected to apply for an immigrant visa from abroad. But today’s announcement does not prevent those who qualify from seeking adjustment of status, although applicants should exercise greater caution and understand that certain factors may negatively affect their chances of approval.

Continue reading

by

vilkasss-ai-generated-8894582-scaledU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is reportedly increasing scrutiny of EB-5 immigrant investor applications filed by individuals with ties to certain Chinese technology companies and institutions.

Recent cases suggest that adjudicators are looking beyond traditional EB-5 requirements—such as lawful source of funds and job creation—and are instead placing greater emphasis on national security concerns, including potential connections to Chinese companies involved in telecommunications, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data infrastructure.

Applicants who have worked for or are affiliated with major firms and universities associated with China’s tech ecosystem may face additional background checks and requests for detailed disclosures about their employment history, organizational roles, and any perceived government or military links.

Continue reading