Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Policies

by

marek-studzinski-vUIUHWK3LFc-unsplash-scaledThe cost of sponsoring an H-1B worker could soon change dramatically.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a new $103,265 fee for H-1B cap-subject petitions—on top of the government filing fees employers already pay.

The proposal was published in the Federal Register on August 25, 2026.

Who Would Have to Pay?

The proposed six-figure fee would apply to H-1B petitions subject to the annual cap, including beneficiaries selected under the 20,000-visa U.S. advanced degree exemption.

Importantly, the fee would apply whether the petition requests:

  • Change of status inside the United States; or
  • Consular notification for an H-1B visa abroad.

The $103,265 payment would be due when the employer files the H-1B petition—not during the initial H-1B registration process.

Who Would Not Be Affected?

The proposal is limited to cap-subject cases.

Cap-exempt H-1B petitions would not be subject to the new fee. This generally includes H-1B extensions and qualifying petitions filed by cap-exempt organizations, such as certain universities, nonprofit research organizations, and governmental research organizations.

Continue reading

by

kreatikar-globe-3411506_1280-1On August 21, 2026, a federal judge struck down the Trump administration policy that blocked immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries, allowing the green card process to resume for thousands of family- and employment-based green card applicants.

The policy, which took effect in January 2026, directed U.S. consulates to pause immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries identified by the State Department as presenting a higher risk of relying on public benefits.

These countries included:

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.

Although applicants could continue submitting documents and attending interviews, many could not actually receive their immigrant visas solely because of their nationality.

Continue reading

by

igor-lolatto-TdwYsTmA2Bc-unsplash-scaledThe public charge rule is changing again, and this time USCIS will be allowed to look at a much wider range of government benefits.

But before you panic about Medicaid, SNAP, housing assistance, or other benefits, ask one question first:

Does the public charge rule even apply to you?

In this blog post, we break this down so you don’t have to.

When does the public charge rule take effect?

The new USCIS guidance takes effect September 18, 2026, and applies to Forms I-485 postmarked or electronically submitted on or after that date.

Here is the easiest way to figure out where you stand.

Step 1: Are You Even Subject to the Public Charge Rule?

Public charge does not apply to every immigrant.

As a general rule, most people applying to become permanent residents are subject to public charge rules, unless Congress has specifically exempted your immigration category.

You Are Generally Subject to Public Charge If You Are Applying for a Green Card Through:

Immigration Category Public Charge?
Spouse of a U.S. citizen YES
Parent of a U.S. citizen YES
Child of a U.S. citizen YES
Family-preference categories F1, F2A, F2B, F3 or F4 YES
K-1 fiancé(e) adjusting status YES
Employment-based EB-1 YES
Employment-based EB-2, including many NIW applicants YES
Employment-based EB-3 YES
EB-4 applicants unless separately exempt Generally YES
EB-5 investors YES
Diversity Visa adjustment YES

In other words, being sponsored by your U.S. citizen spouse does not exempt you. Neither does having an approved employment petition or qualifying for an EB-2 National Interest Waiver.

Continue reading

by

ironhorse71-tourist-8183867_1280Recent developments in U.S. immigration law and immigration enforcement have changed the risks associated with both international and domestic travel for certain noncitizens.

This does not mean that all travel is unsafe or that every person with a pending immigration case should avoid traveling.

However, beginning August 13, 2026, your immigration history, current status, prior periods of unlawful presence, and pending applications may significantly affect whether travel is advisable.

For this reason, individuals with unresolved immigration-status issues should carefully review their circumstances before making any travel plans on or after August 13th.

Major Change to International Travel With Advance Parole

One of the most significant recent developments involves Advance Parole.

Advance Parole is a travel document that may allow certain noncitizens—including some applicants with a pending Form I-485 Application to Adjust Status—to temporarily leave the United States and regain admission using advance parole after temporary foreign travel.

For years, many applicants relied on the rule established in Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, 25 I&N Dec. 771 (BIA 2012), which generally held that temporary international travel under Advance Parole was not considered a “departure” for purposes of the unlawful-presence bar addressed in that case.

That rule has now changed.

On August 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued its precedential decision in Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, 29 I&N Dec. 830 (BIA 2026). The BIA expressly overruled Arrabally and Yerrabelly and held that leaving the United States pursuant to Advance Parole can constitute a “departure” under INA § 212(a)(9)(B).

This is an important change because departure from the United States can trigger serious immigration consequences for individuals who previously accumulated unlawful presence.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-programming-9199585_1280The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is moving forward with a new proposal that could eliminate the 60-day grace period currently available to certain employment-based nonimmigrant workers after their employment ends.

On August 6, 2026, DHS submitted a proposed rule titled “Eliminating the Discretionary 60-day Grace Period” to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The proposal has not yet taken effect, and the full text has not yet been released.

What Is the Current 60-Day Grace Period?

Under current regulations, certain nonimmigrant workers whose employment ends before their authorized stay expires may receive a grace period of up to 60 consecutive days, or until the expiration of their authorized stay, whichever comes first.

The protection currently applies to workers in the following classifications:

  • E-1
  • E-2
  • E-3
  • H-1B
  • H-1B1
  • L-1
  • O-1
  • TN

Their dependent family members are also covered by the provision.

The 60-day grace period gives workers valuable time after losing or leaving a job to find another employer, seek a change or extension of immigration status, or prepare to leave the United States. Workers generally cannot continue working during the grace period unless they have another independent basis for employment authorization.

Continue reading

by

elisariva-hammer-3183166-scaledYesterday, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration’s policy pausing immigrant visa approvals for nationals of 75 countries violates federal immigration law.

The State Department introduced the policy in January 2026, directing consular officers to refuse covered immigrant visa applications while the government developed additional screening procedures concerning whether applicants might become dependent on public benefits.

The freeze affected primarily family-based applicants, along with some employment- and investment-based applicants.

Continue reading

by

tilixia-summer-money-8023328-scaledThe Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that it is rescinding the public charge regulation that has been in place since December 2022.

The change will take effect on September 18, 2026. Until then, the current 2022 rule remains in effect.

What Is the Public Charge Rule?

The public charge rule allows immigration officers to consider whether certain applicants are likely to become financially dependent on the government in the future.

The rule generally applies to:

  • Certain people applying for a green card from inside the United States;
  • Certain people applying for an immigrant visa at a U.S. embassy or consulate; and
  • Some nonimmigrants in limited circumstances.

A public charge finding may result in the denial of an immigration application.

What Is Changing?

DHS is removing the detailed public charge standards established by the 2022 rule.

The government is not replacing the 2022 rule with another detailed regulation. Instead, USCIS will rely on:

  • The Immigration and Nationality Act;
  • New USCIS policy guidance;
  • The applicant’s individual circumstances; and
  • The immigration officer’s discretion.

This means USCIS officers may have more flexibility when deciding whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge.

Continue reading

by

update-1672346_1920

On July 10, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued new employment-authorization guidance, affecting certain Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries from Haiti, Burma, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

The guidance was released shortly before the affected employment-authorization dates were scheduled to expire. Under the updated USCIS instructions, covered Haitian TPS beneficiaries have employment authorization through July 24, 2026. Covered beneficiaries from the other six countries have employment authorization through July 17, 2026. The temporary extensions affect hundreds of thousands of workers.

Updated employment-authorization dates

TPS country Updated USCIS expiration date
Haiti                                 July 24, 2026
Burma (Myanmar)                                 July 17, 2026
Ethiopia                                 July 17, 2026
Somalia                                 July 17, 2026
South Sudan                                 July 17, 2026
Syria                                 July 17, 2026
Yemen                                 July 17, 2026

TPS beneficiaries affected by these developments should immediately consult with a qualified immigration attorney to evaluate whether they may qualify for another lawful immigration status or form of relief.

Continue reading

by

brittani-burns-98uYQ-KupiE-unsplash-scaled

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court terminated Haiti and Syria’s TPS status on June 25th
  • Approximately, 350,000 individuals will lose their work authorization and be subject to removal
  • Affected individuals must seek alternative legal status immediately to avoid removal proceedings once the transition period ends.

On July 1, 2026, DHS and USCIS set a temporary expiration date of July 10, 2026 for work permits held by Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries from seven countries (Haiti, Syria, Burma, Yemen, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Somalia), after a Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for the government to end those protections.

On June 25th the Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can move forward with ending TPS for certain countries specifically Haiti and Syria even while other smaller legal battles about those terminations continue in lower courts.

Although the deadline for some countries could still be extended while lower court cases continue, DHS has described any continued relief as temporary.

Continue reading

by

jorono-flag-2693195-scaledOn June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for more than 350,000 people from Haiti and Syria who have been legally living and working in the United States.

Although the ruling directly affects only TPS holders from Haiti and Syria, its impact could reach much further.

The decision may have consequences for the broader TPS program, which currently protects about 1.3 million people from more than a dozen countries.

What is TPS

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a temporary immigration protection that allows people from certain countries to live and work legally in the United States, when it is unsafe for them to return home because of conditions like war, natural disasters, or major political instability.

The federal government determines which countries qualify for TPS and decides whether conditions in those countries justify renewing their designation.

The Ruling

The case, Mullin v. Doe, written by Justice Alito, held that courts do not have authority to review an administration’s decision to terminate TPS for a particular country. The court also rejected a constitutional claim brought by Haitian TPS holders, who argued that Haiti’s designation was ended because of racial bias. The court found that the evidence was not enough to show that racism played a motivating role in the decision.

Continue reading