Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Non-Citizens

by

rtanvir-ukraine-7096789_1280Thousands of Ukrainian and Sudanese immigrants will retain their Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for now, despite their current designations being scheduled to expire on October 19, 2026.

On October 18, 2026, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed to CBS News that existing TPS beneficiaries from both countries will remain protected while the agency considers whether to formally extend or terminate their designations.

According to DHS, final decisions will “be made at the appropriate time.” Until then, affected beneficiaries will “retain protection.”

What Is Temporary Protected Status (TPS)?

TPS is a humanitarian immigration program that allows eligible nationals of designated countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other extraordinary conditions to temporarily remain in the United States.

Individuals granted TPS generally receive protection from deportation and may obtain employment authorization. However, TPS does not automatically provide a pathway to permanent residency.

What Is Changing for Ukraine and Sudan?

In January 2025, DHS extended TPS for both Ukraine and Sudan for 18 months, from April 20, 2025, through October 19, 2026.

The extensions were based on continuing armed conflict and dangerous conditions preventing nationals from safely returning to their home countries.

According to CBS News, DHS has now confirmed that existing beneficiaries will retain their protections while the agency determines the future of the programs.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-cash-3242592The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have finalized a rule making it easier and faster for the government to impose civil monetary penalties for certain immigration violations.

The rule applies to noncitizens who:

  • Willfully fail or refuse to leave the United States after a final removal order
  • Fail to depart within the time permitted under a voluntary departure order or
  • Are apprehended while unlawfully entering or attempting to enter the United States.

The rule does not create entirely new penalties. Instead, it changes the procedures DHS uses to impose existing fines.

How Much Are the Fines?

Current penalties can include:

  • $100 to $500 for unlawful entry or attempted entry;
  • Approximately $1,992 to $9,970 for failure to comply with voluntary departure; and
  • Up to $998 per day for willfully failing to depart after a final removal order.

Because some penalties accrue daily, the total amount can grow to hundreds of thousands of dollars or even exceed $1 million in long-running cases.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-visa-3653493-scaledMajor changes to the public charge policy took effect on September 18, 2026, changing how USCIS evaluates individuals applying for permanent residence in the United States.

The new policy gives immigration officers more discretion to consider government benefits and an individual’s circumstances when deciding whether someone is likely to become a public charge.

What Is Public Charge?

“Public charge” is a ground of inadmissibility used to determine whether a green card applicant is likely to rely on government assistance for support.

A public charge finding can affect whether an applicant is allowed to obtain permanent residence or enter the United States.

What Changed on September 18, 2026?

The federal government rescinded the 2022 DHS public charge rule and replaced the way USCIS evaluates green card applications with new agency guidance.

The change became effective September 18, 2026.

Under the new policy:

  • USCIS may consider a broader range of government-funded benefits.
  • Immigration officers have greater discretion when reviewing an applicant’s circumstances.
  • Means-tested benefits which are programs generally available based on income or financial need may now be considered.
  • The government may also consider a wider range of financial circumstances to evaluate whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge.

Receiving a public benefit does not automatically mean that someone will be denied a green card on public charge grounds. The determination depends on the person’s particular immigration case and circumstances.

Continue reading

by

ironhorse71-tourist-8183867_1280Recent developments in U.S. immigration law and immigration enforcement have changed the risks associated with both international and domestic travel for certain noncitizens.

This does not mean that all travel is unsafe or that every person with a pending immigration case should avoid traveling.

However, beginning August 13, 2026, your immigration history, current status, prior periods of unlawful presence, and pending applications may significantly affect whether travel is advisable.

For this reason, individuals with unresolved immigration-status issues should carefully review their circumstances before making any travel plans on or after August 13th.

Major Change to International Travel With Advance Parole

One of the most significant recent developments involves Advance Parole.

Advance Parole is a travel document that may allow certain noncitizens—including some applicants with a pending Form I-485 Application to Adjust Status—to temporarily leave the United States and regain admission using advance parole after temporary foreign travel.

For years, many applicants relied on the rule established in Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, 25 I&N Dec. 771 (BIA 2012), which generally held that temporary international travel under Advance Parole was not considered a “departure” for purposes of the unlawful-presence bar addressed in that case.

That rule has now changed.

On August 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued its precedential decision in Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, 29 I&N Dec. 830 (BIA 2026). The BIA expressly overruled Arrabally and Yerrabelly and held that leaving the United States pursuant to Advance Parole can constitute a “departure” under INA § 212(a)(9)(B).

This is an important change because departure from the United States can trigger serious immigration consequences for individuals who previously accumulated unlawful presence.

Continue reading

by

my-profit-tutor-2ffbvalZbNA-unsplash-scaled

The U.S. Department of State is preparing to test a new optional premium service for B-1/B-2 visitor visa applicants. Under the pilot program, eligible business and tourism visa applicants may pay a $750 premium fee to expedite interview scheduling for B-1/B-2 visas. This fee is separate from the regular visa application fee.

Key Timeline and Details

  • Effective Dates: The pilot program is expected to run from July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, unless the government changes or extends it.
  • Who It Applies To: The fee applies only to B-1/B-2 business and tourism visa applicants. It does not apply to other visa categories such as H-1B, L-1, F-1, H-4, or immigrant visas.
  • Cost: The expedited appointment fee is $750 per person, in addition to the normal B-1/B-2 visa application fee, which is currently $185.
  • Expected Benefit: Eligible applicants may be able to schedule an interview within 10 business days, depending on availability at the selected post.

How It Works

Applicants must first complete the regular visa application process, including submitting the DS-160, paying the standard visa application fee, and scheduling a regular visa interview.

If the selected U.S. consulate participates in the pilot program and has expedited slots available, the applicant may then be given the option to upgrade to a faster appointment by paying the $750 fee.

Continue reading

by

vilkasss-ai-generated-9817359-scaledThe U.S. Department of Justice has officially closed the San Francisco Immigration Court months earlier than expected, transferring its operations to the Concord Immigration Court.

The sudden closure has caused uncertainty for thousands of immigrants whose cases were pending in San Francisco.

Immigration courts handle deportation proceedings, asylum claims, and other immigration-related hearings.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-graduation-7077409_1280
The White House is reviewing a proposed federal rule (RIN: 1653-AA95) that could change how international students maintain legal status in the United States. The proposal, submitted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), would replace the long-standing “duration of status” framework with fixed-term limits for student visas.

If finalized, the rule would affect students on F-1 visas, as well as some exchange visitors and foreign media. Under the current system, international students can remain in the U.S. for as long as they are enrolled full-time and comply with visa requirements.

The proposed change would instead impose a four-year stay limit before students would need to apply for a renewal of their status.

Continue reading

by

d4rkwzd-recruitment-6838250_1280The Trump administration has introduced a new visa screening policy at consulate interviews that could make it harder for people with potential asylum claims to enter the United States.

According to the Washington Post, consular officers are now directed to ask nonimmigrant visa applicants whether they have been persecuted in their home country, or fear harm if they return.

That question may sound harmless, but the consequences are significant. If an applicant says they have suffered harm/mistreatment in their country, or fear harm/mistreatment in returning home, their visa could be denied. If they say they do not fear returning to their home country and later apply for asylum in the United States, the government may use that earlier answer against them. This creates a serious dilemma for people who may genuinely need protection in the future.

The policy appears designed to screen potential asylum claims before an applicant ever reaches U.S. soil. Under U.S. asylum law, a person generally must be physically present in the United States or arrive at a U.S. border to request asylum. By using the visa process to flag and deny applicants who may later seek protection, the government could stop some individuals from ever getting the chance to present their asylum claims.

This change could especially affect people from countries facing political violence, religious persecution, war, government abuse, or targeted discrimination. Students, tourists, workers, and business visitors may all face difficult questions if they have legitimate reasons to travel to the U.S. on temporary visas but also fear returning home.

Continue reading

by

noupload-fingerprint-2108872

USCIS is expected to pause or delay adjudication of certain immigration benefit requests that require fingerprint-based background checks following the agency’s implementation of a new enhanced FBI security vetting process.

The new process became effective on April 27, 2026.

According to reports, USCIS officers have been directed to submit pending applications for enhanced FBI background checks and to withhold final adjudication until the required security clearances are completed.

The initial group of impacted cases is expected to include applications for which fingerprints were already collected and submitted before April 27, 2026.

At a Glance

Applications requiring fingerprint-based background checks may be subject to an adjudication pause for enhanced security checks, based on new USCIS internal guidance

Affected case types are expected to include adjustment of status, asylum, naturalization, family-based green card sponsorship petitions, and other immigration benefit requests requiring biometrics (fingerprints).

For pending cases where fingerprints were submitted before April 27, USCIS officers are expected to re-submit the fingerprints already on file through the new FBI system. Applicants generally should not be required to take further action unless specifically instructed by USCIS.

Newly filed cases received after April 27 may also be placed in a processing queue while USCIS works through the backlog of pending cases requiring re-vetting. At this time, one reported exception appears to be U.S. citizenship applications where oath ceremonies have already been scheduled.

Continue reading

by

mana5280-XiF1p97u3fc-unsplash-scaled

Rising tensions in the Middle East are causing immediate disruptions to visa processing and international travel across the region. According to the State Department, several embassies throughout the Middle East have halted or significantly limited visa services following airstrikes targeting Iran and subsequent retaliatory actions.

The situation is fluid and is evolving on a daily basis.

Widespread Travel Disruptions Across the Middle East

The escalating security situation has triggered widespread travel interruptions throughout the region. Airspace closures have been reported in Iran, Israel, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Iraq, and Qatar. Airlines have suspended flights throughout the region, and there are reports of land border closures and shelter-in-place advisories in several countries.

These disruptions are expected to significantly affect visa issuance, passport returns, and the movement of workers.

U.S. Embassy Visa Services Suspended or Limited

The following U.S. diplomatic missions across the region have implemented operational changes, including canceled appointments, and the suspension of routine visa services until further notice.

  • United Arab Emirates: The U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi and the U.S. Consulate in Dubai canceled all visa and U.S. citizen services appointments from March 2–4 while personnel sheltered in place.
  • Beirut: Since February 23rd non-emergency personnel have departed and all consular visa services have been suspended.
  • Qatar: Routine consular appointments at the U.S. Embassy in Doha have been canceled due to ongoing security concerns until further notice.
  • Israel: The U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem and the Tel Aviv branch office have suspended all routine visa services through March 13 and are prioritizing assistance to U.S. citizens.
  • Jordan: The U.S. Embassy in Amman issued a shelter-in-place directive and visa services are suspended for the foreseeable future.
  • Kuwait: Embassy personnel have been ordered to shelter in place and all routine visa have been suspended.
  • Dubai: The U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi and the Dubai branch office issued a shelter-in-place directive and all routine visa services and appointments have been postponed.
  • Pakistan: The State Department has ordered non-emergency U.S. government employees from U.S. Consulates Lahore and Karachi to leave Pakistan due to safety risks.  At the U.S. Embassy Islamabad, the consulate will not be open for routine services on March 6, but staff remain available for emergency services only.
  • Cyprus: The State Department ordered non-emergency U.S. government employees to leave Cyprus due to the threat of armed conflict. All routine visa services and U.S. Citizen services have been suspended.
  • Saudi Arabia: The U.S. Mission in Saudi Arabia has suspended all routine and emergency consular services until further notice. The State Department has authorized non-emergency U.S. government employees to leave Saudi Arabia. The U.S. Consulate in Dhahran has specifically ordered the public to stay away from the area due to ongoing attacks and security concerns.

Continue reading