Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Federal Register

by

glopezr-wheel-2121197_1280A federal judge has ordered the U.S. Department of State to reopen registration for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Diversity Visa (DV) Lottery, commonly known as the Green Card Lottery, following delays and suspension of the program.

On October 14, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California issued a preliminary injunction requiring the State Department to resume the DV-2027 program and establish a new registration timeline.

Key Dates and Deadlines

Under the court’s order, the State Department must:

  • October 29, 2026: Publicly announce the registration dates, official application website, and eligibility requirements.
  • November 1, 2026: Open DV-2027 lottery registration for a period of 30 days.
  • December 3, 2026: Notify individuals selected through the lottery.
  • September 30, 2027: Continue processing eligible DV-2027 immigrant visa applications until this date or until the annual visa allocation is exhausted, whichever occurs first.

Why Was the Lottery Suspended?

The State Department initially announced changes to the DV-2027 registration process in November 2025. The program was subsequently paused in December 2025, resulting in legal challenges seeking to restore lottery registration.

The federal court’s preliminary injunction requires the government to move forward with the program while litigation continues.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-cash-3242592The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have finalized a rule making it easier and faster for the government to impose civil monetary penalties for certain immigration violations.

The rule applies to noncitizens who:

  • Willfully fail or refuse to leave the United States after a final removal order
  • Fail to depart within the time permitted under a voluntary departure order or
  • Are apprehended while unlawfully entering or attempting to enter the United States.

The rule does not create entirely new penalties. Instead, it changes the procedures DHS uses to impose existing fines.

How Much Are the Fines?

Current penalties can include:

  • $100 to $500 for unlawful entry or attempted entry;
  • Approximately $1,992 to $9,970 for failure to comply with voluntary departure; and
  • Up to $998 per day for willfully failing to depart after a final removal order.

Because some penalties accrue daily, the total amount can grow to hundreds of thousands of dollars or even exceed $1 million in long-running cases.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-exam-3588192_1280The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a major change to the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program for F-1 international students.

Under a proposed rule published on October 8, 2026, schools would be required to pay a $70,000 fee the first time an F-1 student is recommended for OPT. A $30,000 fee would apply to each subsequent OPT recommendation, including a STEM OPT extension.

For example, an F-1 student who completes 12 months of post-completion OPT and then receives a 24-month STEM OPT extension could generate $100,000 in total fees—$70,000 for the initial OPT period and another $30,000 for the STEM extension.

Who Would Pay the Fee?

Technically, the SEVP-certified school, not the student or employer, would be responsible for paying the fee before the school’s designated school official (DSO) could recommend the student for OPT.

However, DHS acknowledges that schools could pass some or all of that cost on to the F-1 student, other students, or employers.

The fee would be connected to the school’s OPT recommendation, not to a particular employer. Changing employers alone would therefore not trigger another fee.

Why Is DHS Proposing the Change?

DHS says the new fees are intended to reduce fraud and abuse in the OPT program, strengthen immigration enforcement and program integrity, and address concerns about the impact of OPT employment on U.S. workers.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-visa-3653493-scaledMajor changes to the public charge policy took effect on September 18, 2026, changing how USCIS evaluates individuals applying for permanent residence in the United States.

The new policy gives immigration officers more discretion to consider government benefits and an individual’s circumstances when deciding whether someone is likely to become a public charge.

What Is Public Charge?

“Public charge” is a ground of inadmissibility used to determine whether a green card applicant is likely to rely on government assistance for support.

A public charge finding can affect whether an applicant is allowed to obtain permanent residence or enter the United States.

What Changed on September 18, 2026?

The federal government rescinded the 2022 DHS public charge rule and replaced the way USCIS evaluates green card applications with new agency guidance.

The change became effective September 18, 2026.

Under the new policy:

  • USCIS may consider a broader range of government-funded benefits.
  • Immigration officers have greater discretion when reviewing an applicant’s circumstances.
  • Means-tested benefits which are programs generally available based on income or financial need may now be considered.
  • The government may also consider a wider range of financial circumstances to evaluate whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge.

Receiving a public benefit does not automatically mean that someone will be denied a green card on public charge grounds. The determination depends on the person’s particular immigration case and circumstances.

Continue reading

by

creativecanvasdesign-student-10443989_1280On September 14th a federal judge temporarily blocked a Trump administration rule that would have placed fixed limits on how long certain international students, exchange visitors, and foreign journalists could remain in the United States.

The Department of Homeland Security rule was scheduled to take effect on September 15, 2026 that would have replaced the longstanding “duration of status” system with fixed admission periods.

Under the rule, most F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors would have been limited to four years, while foreign journalists in I status would generally have been limited to 240 days. Individuals needing additional time would have been required to request an extension from DHS.

Currently, many F-1 and J-1 visa holders are admitted for “duration of status,” commonly shown as D/S, allowing them to remain in the United States as long as they continue complying with the requirements of their immigration status and authorized program.

Why Did the Court Block the Rule?

On September 14, U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV ruled that the plaintiffs had shown a substantial likelihood of succeeding in their challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act.

The government argued the new restrictions were needed to address fraud, abuse, and national-security concerns. The court found that it had not adequately connected the fixed time limits to those concerns and had not sufficiently addressed alternatives or objections raised during the rulemaking process.

Continue reading

by

roszie-termination-7386583_1280DHS has officially published a proposed rule that would eliminate the 60-day grace period currently available to certain nonimmigrant workers after their employment ends.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on September 11, 2026. The proposal would affect workers in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN status, as well as their dependent family members.

Old Rule

Under current rules, eligible workers may receive a grace period of up to 60 days after their employment ends, or until the expiration of their authorized stay, whichever is shorter. This period can give workers time to find a new employer, change immigration status, or make arrangements to leave the United States.

New Proposal

DHS is proposing to eliminate this protection. If the rule is finalized as written, affected workers would generally be considered out of status beginning the day after their qualifying employment ends unless they have another lawful basis to remain in the United States.

DHS states that the change would more closely tie a worker’s immigration status to the employment that supports that status and reduce the administrative burden associated with determining whether the grace period applies.

Importantly, this is only a proposed rule. The current 60-day grace period remains in effect at this time.

The public comment period is open through November 10, 2026. After reviewing public comments, DHS may modify the proposal and issue a final rule.

Continue reading

by

marek-studzinski-vUIUHWK3LFc-unsplash-scaledThe cost of sponsoring an H-1B worker could soon change dramatically.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a new $103,265 fee for H-1B cap-subject petitions—on top of the government filing fees employers already pay.

The proposal was published in the Federal Register on August 25, 2026.

Who Would Have to Pay?

The proposed six-figure fee would apply to H-1B petitions subject to the annual cap, including beneficiaries selected under the 20,000-visa U.S. advanced degree exemption.

Importantly, the fee would apply whether the petition requests:

  • Change of status inside the United States; or
  • Consular notification for an H-1B visa abroad.

The $103,265 payment would be due when the employer files the H-1B petition—not during the initial H-1B registration process.

Who Would Not Be Affected?

The proposal is limited to cap-subject cases.

Cap-exempt H-1B petitions would not be subject to the new fee. This generally includes H-1B extensions and qualifying petitions filed by cap-exempt organizations, such as certain universities, nonprofit research organizations, and governmental research organizations.

Continue reading

by

yamu_jay-ai-generated-8998390-scaledThe Department of Homeland Security has issued a final rule ending the longstanding practice of admitting certain foreign nationals for “duration of status,” commonly shown as D/S on Form I-94.

The rule is scheduled to take effect on September 15, 2026. Because it is classified as a major rule subject to congressional review, DHS will publish another notice if Congress changes the rule or its effective date.

Who Is Affected?

The rule applies to:

  • F visa holders: International students and their dependents;
  • J visa holders: Exchange visitors and their dependents; and
  • I visa holders: Representatives of foreign information media and their dependents.

What Is Changing?

F, J, and I visa holders have traditionally been allowed to remain in the United States while they continued their authorized studies, exchange programs, practical training, or media assignments.

Under the new rule:

  • Form I-94 will contain a specific expiration date;
  • An updated Form I-20 or Form DS-2019 will not automatically extend a person’s authorized stay;
  • Individuals who need additional time must generally apply for an extension with USCIS; and
  • USCIS may require biometrics as part of the extension process.

Continue reading

by

ai-generated-8051223_1280The Department of Homeland Security has proposed sweeping new regulations that could significantly reshape the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.

Published on July 2, 2026, the proposed rule seeks to formally implement many of the changes Congress enacted through the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 while introducing stricter compliance, enforcement, fraud-prevention, and national-security requirements.

Importantly, this is only a proposed rule. It is not yet final, and the proposed changes have not automatically taken effect. DHS is accepting public comments through August 31, 2026, before deciding whether to issue a final regulation.

What Is the EB-5 Investor Visa Program?

The EB-5 program offers qualifying foreign investors a pathway to lawful permanent residence by investing capital in a U.S. business that creates at least 10 full-time jobs for qualifying U.S. workers.

The current minimum investment is generally:

  • $1,050,000 for a standard EB-5 investment; or
  • $800,000 for an investment in a targeted employment area or qualifying infrastructure project.

Targeted employment areas include certain rural locations and areas experiencing high unemployment. Investors may invest directly in their own commercial enterprise or through a USCIS-designated regional center.

New Investment Amount for High-Employment Areas

One of the most significant provisions would establish a separate investment amount for projects located in areas with particularly low unemployment.

DHS proposes requiring an investment of $1.4 million for projects principally doing business in a defined “high-employment area.” Under the proposal, this would generally include certain metropolitan areas where unemployment is significantly below the national average.

The standard, targeted-area, infrastructure, and high-employment investment amounts would be adjusted for inflation beginning January 1, 2027, and every five years afterward.

Continue reading

by

roszie-termination-7386579-scaledThe Department of Homeland Security has published a new proposed rule making it more difficult for certain noncitizens to obtain and maintain work authorization in the United States.

The proposal would affect humanitarian parolees, certain recipients of deferred action, individuals with final removal orders, and other noncitizens who currently qualify for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs).

The proposal would also make it more difficult for applicants with criminal histories, arrests, or admissions of criminal conduct to obtain work authorization, unless there are significant public-interest factors that justify a favorable exercise of discretion, such as cooperation with law enforcement.

If implemented, the changes would represent a significant shift away from broad access to employment authorization and toward a more restrictive, discretionary system. Many immigrants who rely on work permits to support themselves and their families could face increased uncertainty.

Continue reading