Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Interviews

by

memed_nurrohmad-new-york-1670435_1280

The Trump administration’s 75-country immigrant visa pause may be over following a federal court ruling, but thousands of previously refused applications remain unresolved.

In an October 5, 2026 court filing, the State Department revealed that only 706 affected applications were adjudicated between August 21 and September 30. Of those, just 318 were approved for visa issuance or resulted in visas being issued.

These figures highlight the slow progress in addressing more than 43,000 applications previously refused solely under the pause.

With no firm deadline for reconsideration, federal litigation may be an important option for applicants seeking to move their cases forward.

Key Highlights

  • The 75-country immigrant visa pause was struck down on August 21, 2026.
  • More than 43,000 applications were previously refused solely under the policy.
  • Between August 21 and September 30, only 706 affected applications were adjudicated, with 318 approved for issuance or issued and 388 refused under other immigration provisions.
  • Applicants whose visas were previously refused are not guaranteed automatic reconsideration within a specific timeframe.
  • Federal lawsuits, including mandamus actions, may offer a way to challenge unreasonable delays and seek action on previously refused applications.

What Do the Latest Visa Processing Statistics Reveal?

The State Department’s October 5 court filing in CLINIC v. Rubio provides a clearer picture of how slowly visa processing has progressed since the pause was lifted.

Continue reading

by

lenahelfinger-november-5650851-scaledThe U.S. Department of State has released the November 2026 Visa Bulletin, announcing several significant changes to employment-based and family-sponsored immigrant visa categories.

This month’s bulletin features one-year advancements in several family-sponsored categories for Worldwide, China, and India, alongside more modest employment-based gains. No retrogressions are reported.

Which Chart Will USCIS Use in November 2026?

For November 2026, USCIS will use the Dates for Filing chart for both:

  • Family-sponsored preference categories
  • Employment-based preference categories

Eligible applicants may use these charts to determine whether they can file Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

The Final Action Dates chart continues to determine when immigrant visas are available for final approval.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-visa-3653493-scaledMajor changes to the public charge policy took effect on September 18, 2026, changing how USCIS evaluates individuals applying for permanent residence in the United States.

The new policy gives immigration officers more discretion to consider government benefits and an individual’s circumstances when deciding whether someone is likely to become a public charge.

What Is Public Charge?

“Public charge” is a ground of inadmissibility used to determine whether a green card applicant is likely to rely on government assistance for support.

A public charge finding can affect whether an applicant is allowed to obtain permanent residence or enter the United States.

What Changed on September 18, 2026?

The federal government rescinded the 2022 DHS public charge rule and replaced the way USCIS evaluates green card applications with new agency guidance.

The change became effective September 18, 2026.

Under the new policy:

  • USCIS may consider a broader range of government-funded benefits.
  • Immigration officers have greater discretion when reviewing an applicant’s circumstances.
  • Means-tested benefits which are programs generally available based on income or financial need may now be considered.
  • The government may also consider a wider range of financial circumstances to evaluate whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge.

Receiving a public benefit does not automatically mean that someone will be denied a green card on public charge grounds. The determination depends on the person’s particular immigration case and circumstances.

Continue reading

by

blessing-ri-mBRtqyC_Iq0-unsplash-scaled

We are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the September 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of September, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

Highlights of the September 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of September?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

  • No changes except for EB-4 which will advance 2 months to December 15, 2022
  • EB-2 India and EB-5 India remain unavailable
  • The State Department warns that the EB-2, EB-1 India, and EB-5 unreserved categories may become unavailable before the end of September, with availability resuming when the new fiscal year starts in October.

Dates for Filing Advancements

  • No changes from August Visa Bulletin

Family-Sponsored Categories

Final Action Advancements

F-1 Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens

  • Mexico will advance 1 month to January 1, 2008
  • Worldwide, China, and India will advance 13 months to January 22, 2020

F-2A Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents

  • Mexico will advance 1 month to August 22, 2025
  • All other countries will advance 1 month to August 22, 2026

F-2B Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents

  • Worldwide, China, India will advance 1 year and 7 months to August 22, 2019

Continue reading

by

markus-spiske-RX-BevgxSXs-unsplash-scaledIn a policy memorandum released today, just ahead of the Memorial Day holiday, the Trump administration announced that temporary visa holders seeking green cards should leave the United States and complete their immigration process through consular processing in their home countries.

But is adjustment of status completely off the table? No. While the government has made clear that individuals intending to immigrate to the United States are generally expected to pursue immigrant visas abroad, adjustment of status remains a discretionary pathway to a green card.

When deciding whether to exercise discretion to grant adjustment of status in the United States, USCIS officers will apply a “totality of the circumstances” analysis, weighing both favorable and unfavorable factors before reaching a decision.

Overview

For decades, Adjustment of Status has been one of the most reliable pathways to apply for a green card for immigrants already living in the U.S., who entered the country lawfully. This process has involved filing the I-485, remaining in the country while the green card case is pending, waiting for an interview, and receiving a final approval.

The ability to apply for adjustment of status has not been taken away with today’s announcement, however, the sense of security that applicants once had has been blurred.

The Policy Memorandum

In its policy memorandum, the government stressed that individuals admitted to the United States on temporary visas (tourist, student, work visas, etc.) are generally expected to leave the country rather than pursue Adjustment of Status from inside the U.S.

Instead, those wishing to remain in the U.S. permanently are expected to apply for an immigrant visa from abroad. But today’s announcement does not prevent those who qualify from seeking adjustment of status, although applicants should exercise greater caution and understand that certain factors may negatively affect their chances of approval.

Continue reading

by

d4rkwzd-recruitment-6838250_1280The Trump administration has introduced a new visa screening policy at consulate interviews that could make it harder for people with potential asylum claims to enter the United States.

According to the Washington Post, consular officers are now directed to ask nonimmigrant visa applicants whether they have been persecuted in their home country, or fear harm if they return.

That question may sound harmless, but the consequences are significant. If an applicant says they have suffered harm/mistreatment in their country, or fear harm/mistreatment in returning home, their visa could be denied. If they say they do not fear returning to their home country and later apply for asylum in the United States, the government may use that earlier answer against them. This creates a serious dilemma for people who may genuinely need protection in the future.

The policy appears designed to screen potential asylum claims before an applicant ever reaches U.S. soil. Under U.S. asylum law, a person generally must be physically present in the United States or arrive at a U.S. border to request asylum. By using the visa process to flag and deny applicants who may later seek protection, the government could stop some individuals from ever getting the chance to present their asylum claims.

This change could especially affect people from countries facing political violence, religious persecution, war, government abuse, or targeted discrimination. Students, tourists, workers, and business visitors may all face difficult questions if they have legitimate reasons to travel to the U.S. on temporary visas but also fear returning home.

Continue reading

by

arpad-czapp-Cg94g0QFHv4-unsplash-scaledThe U.S. Department of State has announced expanded screening and vetting procedures for visa applicants, effective Monday March 30. As a result, applying for a U.S. visa will now involve closer review of your background, including your online activity.

Who Is Affected

The following nonimmigrant visa applicants may now be subject to enhanced review of their social media and online presence:

  • A-3
  • C-3 (if a domestic worker)
  • G-5
  • H-3
  • H-4 (dependents of H-3)
  • K-1
  • K-2
  • K-3
  • Q
  • R-1
  • R-2
  • S
  • T
  • U

These are in addition to H-1B applicants and their dependents, as well as F, M, and J student and exchange visitor visa applicants already subject to this review.

Continue reading

by

mana5280-XiF1p97u3fc-unsplash-scaled

Rising tensions in the Middle East are causing immediate disruptions to visa processing and international travel across the region. According to the State Department, several embassies throughout the Middle East have halted or significantly limited visa services following airstrikes targeting Iran and subsequent retaliatory actions.

The situation is fluid and is evolving on a daily basis.

Widespread Travel Disruptions Across the Middle East

The escalating security situation has triggered widespread travel interruptions throughout the region. Airspace closures have been reported in Iran, Israel, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Iraq, and Qatar. Airlines have suspended flights throughout the region, and there are reports of land border closures and shelter-in-place advisories in several countries.

These disruptions are expected to significantly affect visa issuance, passport returns, and the movement of workers.

U.S. Embassy Visa Services Suspended or Limited

The following U.S. diplomatic missions across the region have implemented operational changes, including canceled appointments, and the suspension of routine visa services until further notice.

  • United Arab Emirates: The U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi and the U.S. Consulate in Dubai canceled all visa and U.S. citizen services appointments from March 2–4 while personnel sheltered in place.
  • Beirut: Since February 23rd non-emergency personnel have departed and all consular visa services have been suspended.
  • Qatar: Routine consular appointments at the U.S. Embassy in Doha have been canceled due to ongoing security concerns until further notice.
  • Israel: The U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem and the Tel Aviv branch office have suspended all routine visa services through March 13 and are prioritizing assistance to U.S. citizens.
  • Jordan: The U.S. Embassy in Amman issued a shelter-in-place directive and visa services are suspended for the foreseeable future.
  • Kuwait: Embassy personnel have been ordered to shelter in place and all routine visa have been suspended.
  • Dubai: The U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi and the Dubai branch office issued a shelter-in-place directive and all routine visa services and appointments have been postponed.
  • Pakistan: The State Department has ordered non-emergency U.S. government employees from U.S. Consulates Lahore and Karachi to leave Pakistan due to safety risks.  At the U.S. Embassy Islamabad, the consulate will not be open for routine services on March 6, but staff remain available for emergency services only.
  • Cyprus: The State Department ordered non-emergency U.S. government employees to leave Cyprus due to the threat of armed conflict. All routine visa services and U.S. Citizen services have been suspended.
  • Saudi Arabia: The U.S. Mission in Saudi Arabia has suspended all routine and emergency consular services until further notice. The State Department has authorized non-emergency U.S. government employees to leave Saudi Arabia. The U.S. Consulate in Dhahran has specifically ordered the public to stay away from the area due to ongoing attacks and security concerns.

Continue reading

by

boy-5752925_1280
San Diego’s immigration community has been rattled by new reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is arresting individuals with no criminal history during routine green card interviews at USCIS offices—a practice that is historically unprecedented and deeply alarming.

What’s Happening

Starting in early November, immigration attorneys began reporting that ICE agents had been detaining green card applicants at routine interviews conducted at USCIS field offices.

Continue reading

by

raul-najera-TAqspfWom04-unsplash-1-scaledOn September 18, 2025, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a notice in the Federal Register announcing the implementation of a newly revised civics test for naturalization applicants, known as the 2025 Naturalization Civics Test.

This updated version builds on the 2020 test—and will replace the existing 2008 civics examination for most applicants.

The civics test remains a key component of the naturalization process, intended to evaluate an applicant’s knowledge of U.S. history, government, and civic responsibilities. While the English language portion of the test remains unchanged, the civics section has been updated to improve clarity and educational relevance.

What’s New & What’s the Same

  • The 2025 Civics Test builds off the 2020 version (which had been previously introduced by the Trump administration but not widely used), making modifications in content and procedure.
  • About 75% of the questions come from the 2008 test—some carried over exactly, others reworded or updated to reflect current educational goals. The rest (~25%) are entirely new content. Some 2008 questions were removed altogether.
  • English‑language requirements remain the same. The focus is on updating the civics portion only.

Key Changes in Test Procedure

  • The question bank used is the same 128‑question bank that had been introduced in 2020.
  • Applicants will be asked up to 20 questions and must answer at least 12 correctly to pass.
  • A procedural change: the USCIS officer can stop asking additional questions once the applicant either passes (i.e. reaches 12 correct answers) or fails (i.e. accumulates 9 incorrect answers). This reduces extra, unnecessary questions for both parties.

Continue reading