Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Consular Processing

by

alexas_fotos-different-nationalities-1743392-scaled

On November 1, 2026, a new federal lawsuit, Ivannikov v. Rubio (Case No. 2:26-cv-12783), was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, challenging the Trump administration’s failure to open registration for the Diversity Visa (DV) Lottery Program.

The lawsuit was filed by Ivan Ivannikov, a Russian national residing in Los Angeles, against Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It seeks to compel the U.S. Department of State to open registration for both the DV-2027 and DV-2028 lottery programs.

The complaint alleges that the government’s failure to administer the program constitutes unlawful agency delay and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. It asks the court to require registration periods of at least 30 days for both programs and to process applications from individuals subsequently selected.

Background: Previous Court Ruling Temporarily Blocked

The new lawsuit follows an October 14, 2026, preliminary injunction ordering the State Department to reopen DV-2027 registration by November 1, 2026.

However, on October 29, 2026, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked that order while the government’s appeal proceeds, citing legal deficiencies concerning the plaintiff’s ability to bring the earlier lawsuit.

Unlike the previous lawsuit, which was filed by an immigration law firm, the new case is brought by an individual who claims he is personally eligible to participate in the lottery.

Continue reading

by

memed_nurrohmad-new-york-1670435_1280

The Trump administration’s 75-country immigrant visa pause may be over following a federal court ruling, but thousands of previously refused applications remain unresolved.

In an October 5, 2026 court filing, the State Department revealed that only 706 affected applications were adjudicated between August 21 and September 30. Of those, just 318 were approved for visa issuance or resulted in visas being issued.

These figures highlight the slow progress in addressing more than 43,000 applications previously refused solely under the pause.

With no firm deadline for reconsideration, federal litigation may be an important option for applicants seeking to move their cases forward.

Key Highlights

  • The 75-country immigrant visa pause was struck down on August 21, 2026.
  • More than 43,000 applications were previously refused solely under the policy.
  • Between August 21 and September 30, only 706 affected applications were adjudicated, with 318 approved for issuance or issued and 388 refused under other immigration provisions.
  • Applicants whose visas were previously refused are not guaranteed automatic reconsideration within a specific timeframe.
  • Federal lawsuits, including mandamus actions, may offer a way to challenge unreasonable delays and seek action on previously refused applications.

What Do the Latest Visa Processing Statistics Reveal?

The State Department’s October 5 court filing in CLINIC v. Rubio provides a clearer picture of how slowly visa processing has progressed since the pause was lifted.

Continue reading

by

lenahelfinger-november-5650851-scaledThe U.S. Department of State has released the November 2026 Visa Bulletin, announcing several significant changes to employment-based and family-sponsored immigrant visa categories.

This month’s bulletin features one-year advancements in several family-sponsored categories for Worldwide, China, and India, alongside more modest employment-based gains. No retrogressions are reported.

Which Chart Will USCIS Use in November 2026?

For November 2026, USCIS will use the Dates for Filing chart for both:

  • Family-sponsored preference categories
  • Employment-based preference categories

Eligible applicants may use these charts to determine whether they can file Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

The Final Action Dates chart continues to determine when immigrant visas are available for final approval.

Continue reading

by

glopezr-wheel-2121197_1280A federal judge has ordered the U.S. Department of State to reopen registration for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Diversity Visa (DV) Lottery, commonly known as the Green Card Lottery, following delays and suspension of the program.

On October 14, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California issued a preliminary injunction requiring the State Department to resume the DV-2027 program and establish a new registration timeline.

Key Dates and Deadlines

Under the court’s order, the State Department must:

  • October 29, 2026: Publicly announce the registration dates, official application website, and eligibility requirements.
  • November 1, 2026: Open DV-2027 lottery registration for a period of 30 days.
  • December 3, 2026: Notify individuals selected through the lottery.
  • September 30, 2027: Continue processing eligible DV-2027 immigrant visa applications until this date or until the annual visa allocation is exhausted, whichever occurs first.

Why Was the Lottery Suspended?

The State Department initially announced changes to the DV-2027 registration process in November 2025. The program was subsequently paused in December 2025, resulting in legal challenges seeking to restore lottery registration.

The federal court’s preliminary injunction requires the government to move forward with the program while litigation continues.

Continue reading

by

lobostudiohamburg-internet-3113279-scaledStarting October 1, 2026, the State Department is expanding its online screening of visa applicants to include I visas for foreign media representatives, TN visas for Canadian and Mexican professionals, and TD visas for their dependents.

Applicants in these categories are now instructed to make all of their social media profiles “public” or “open” so consular officers can review them.

The new rule expands a vetting system that already applies to several other visa categories, including:

  • Diplomatic and Official Visas: A-3, C-3 (if a domestic worker), G-5
  • Students: F-1, M-1, F-2, M-2
  • Temporary Workers and Trainees: H-1B, H-3, H-4 dependents of H1-B and H-3
  • Exchange Visitors: J-1, J-2
  • Fiancé and Dependents: K-1, K-2, K-3
  • International Cultural Exchange Participants: Q
  • Religious Occupations: R-1, R-2
  • Witnesses, Informants, and Victims: S, T, U

The State Department says it may use information from any available source to determine whether an applicant is eligible for a visa or presents national-security or public-safety concerns.

Continue reading

by

openclipart-vectors-poland-151461_1280-1In this blog post we bring you some important developments impacting visa applicants in September.

First, the U.S. government has resumed immigrant visa processing for applicants in Hungary and Poland, while processing restrictions remain in place in a number of other countries.

The broader pause was connected to changes in how the Department of State evaluates applicants under the public charge rules and additional training for consular officers.

Continue reading

by

 

sharijo-cv-4043315-scaledThe U.S. Department of State has resumed the issuance of Diversity Visas following a federal court order in Medani et al. v. Trump et al. According to the State Department, visa issuance has resumed as of August 28, 2026, ending the suspension that had been in place since December 2025.

The December 2025 suspension had temporarily stopped U.S. Embassies and Consulates from issuing Diversity Visas while the government reviewed screening and vetting procedures. The court order now requires the State Department to resume processing and issuing affected visas.

Why This Matters for DV-2026 Applicants

Timing is especially important for DV-2026 applicants because Diversity Visas generally must be issued by September 30, 2026. If a visa number is not issued by the end of the fiscal year, the opportunity may be lost.

Applicants with pending cases should continue monitoring their case status, attend any scheduled interviews, and respond quickly to requests from the U.S. Embassy or Consulate.

If you have a pending DV-2026 case and are concerned about the September 30 deadline, contact an immigration attorney as soon as possible to discuss how the court order and resumed visa issuance may affect your case.

Continue reading

by

blessing-ri-mBRtqyC_Iq0-unsplash-scaled

We are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the September 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of September, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

Highlights of the September 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of September?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

  • No changes except for EB-4 which will advance 2 months to December 15, 2022
  • EB-2 India and EB-5 India remain unavailable
  • The State Department warns that the EB-2, EB-1 India, and EB-5 unreserved categories may become unavailable before the end of September, with availability resuming when the new fiscal year starts in October.

Dates for Filing Advancements

  • No changes from August Visa Bulletin

Family-Sponsored Categories

Final Action Advancements

F-1 Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens

  • Mexico will advance 1 month to January 1, 2008
  • Worldwide, China, and India will advance 13 months to January 22, 2020

F-2A Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents

  • Mexico will advance 1 month to August 22, 2025
  • All other countries will advance 1 month to August 22, 2026

F-2B Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents

  • Worldwide, China, India will advance 1 year and 7 months to August 22, 2019

Continue reading

by

kreatikar-globe-3411506_1280-1On August 21, 2026, a federal judge struck down the Trump administration policy that blocked immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries, allowing the green card process to resume for thousands of family- and employment-based green card applicants.

The policy, which took effect in January 2026, directed U.S. consulates to pause immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries identified by the State Department as presenting a higher risk of relying on public benefits.

These countries included:

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.

Although applicants could continue submitting documents and attending interviews, many could not actually receive their immigrant visas solely because of their nationality.

Continue reading

by

gdj-ai-generated-9069946_1280President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on August 6, 2026, renewing his administration’s effort to restrict certain forms of birthright citizenship following a major Supreme Court defeat earlier this summer.

The new executive orders, “Ending Birth Tourism” and “Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” take a narrower approach than the administration’s original 2025 birthright-citizenship order.

The action comes after the Supreme Court’s June 30 decision in Trump v. Barbara. The Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully present or only temporarily present in the country are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore are U.S. citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Executive Order Targets “Birth Tourism”

The first new order, “Ending Birth Tourism,” focuses primarily on immigration enforcement rather than directly redefining citizenship.

The order defines “birth tourism” as a foreign national entering the United States on a nonimmigrant visa for the purpose of giving birth in the United States. It also covers individuals or organizations that facilitate such travel. The administration argues that some foreign nationals misuse temporary visa classifications to enter the country specifically so their children will obtain U.S. citizenship.

The order gives the government broad authority to take measures against suspected birth-tourism activity including denying visas or admission, revoking travel authorization, removing individuals who participated in birth tourism, and potentially permanently barring individuals from entering the United States. The government may also take action against businesses or individuals that facilitate birth-tourism arrangements. Humanitarian and national-interest exceptions are permitted.

For foreign nationals traveling while pregnant, the practical impact will depend heavily on the regulations and guidance issued by the State Department and DHS, including how officers determine whether a person’s primary purpose for traveling is to give birth.

Continue reading

Contact Information
1502 6th Ave
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619.819.9204
Fax: 619.393.0467
Email: info@h1b.biz

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Law Offices of Jacob J. Sapochnick
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design