Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in Detentions

by
54361179381_6c960546a1_z

Flickr: Creative Commons Attribution Gage Skidmore

Despite major Democratic victories in the 2026 midterm elections, the Trump administration is expected to continue its aggressive immigration enforcement policies, according to recent reports from the Associated Press.

The appointment of Stephen Miller as White House chief of staff signals that the administration intends to maintain its focus on mass deportations, ICE arrests, and restrictions on legal immigration.

ICE officials have been instructed to target approximately 19,000 arrests per week, or 2,700 per day, up from a previous target of 2,000 daily arrests. The Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that immigration enforcement operations will not slow down.

Meanwhile, Democrats will take control of both chambers of Congress in January 2027, giving them expanded authority to investigate ICE operations, hold oversight hearings, issue subpoenas, and propose restrictions on immigration enforcement funding.

However, their ability to significantly change immigration policy remains limited. President Trump retains veto power, and Congress previously approved approximately $150 billion in immigration enforcement funding, including resources for detention facilities, border security, and additional deportation officers.

Democratic lawmakers are also considering broader immigration reforms, including potential pathways to citizenship for certain undocumented immigrants and expanded legal immigration opportunities.

Continue reading

by

qimono-gavel-2492011_1280

On October 23, 2026, U.S. District Judge Frimpong issued a preliminary injunction ordering U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol agents to stop detaining individuals solely based on their perceived Latino ethnicity or working-class appearance.

The ruling, issued in Vasquez Perdomo v. Mullin, follows extensive evidence presented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other civil rights advocates, including body-camera footage, internal communications, and testimony from individuals detained during immigration enforcement operations, including U.S. citizens.

The injunction applies to seven Southern California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo.

Under the order, immigration agents must have individualized reasonable suspicion supported by specific facts before conducting an investigative detention. An individual’s ethnicity or appearance alone cannot justify a stop. The injunction includes exceptions for ports of entry, checkpoints, and their functional equivalents.

The decision follows an earlier injunction that the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked in 2025. The Department of Homeland Security has denied allegations of racial profiling, and the federal government has appealed the latest ruling.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-cash-3242592The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have finalized a rule making it easier and faster for the government to impose civil monetary penalties for certain immigration violations.

The rule applies to noncitizens who:

  • Willfully fail or refuse to leave the United States after a final removal order
  • Fail to depart within the time permitted under a voluntary departure order or
  • Are apprehended while unlawfully entering or attempting to enter the United States.

The rule does not create entirely new penalties. Instead, it changes the procedures DHS uses to impose existing fines.

How Much Are the Fines?

Current penalties can include:

  • $100 to $500 for unlawful entry or attempted entry;
  • Approximately $1,992 to $9,970 for failure to comply with voluntary departure; and
  • Up to $998 per day for willfully failing to depart after a final removal order.

Because some penalties accrue daily, the total amount can grow to hundreds of thousands of dollars or even exceed $1 million in long-running cases.

Continue reading

by

rainbowart-hat-1217913_1920The Trump administration is reportedly considering a $100,000 fee for international students who want to remain in the United States and work after graduating from an American university.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the proposal is being discussed within the Department of Homeland Security but has not been formally approved or published as a proposed regulation. Important details—including whether the student, university, or employer would pay the fee—remain unresolved.

The fee would affect students seeking employment through Optional Practical Training, commonly known as OPT. The program allows eligible F-1 students to obtain temporary employment directly related to their field of study. Standard post-completion OPT generally lasts up to 12 months, while qualifying STEM graduates may receive an additional 24-month extension.

A $100,000 charge would dramatically increase the cost of remaining in the United States after graduation. It could discourage international students from attending American universities and make it more difficult for employers in technology, finance, research, and other specialized industries to recruit graduates.

The reported proposal follows broader changes to student immigration policy, including new fixed periods of admission and extension requirements for certain F-1 students. DHS has acknowledged that international students contribute to American universities, research, innovation, and local economies, while maintaining that additional restrictions are needed to improve oversight and prevent fraud.

Continue reading

by

jorono-flag-2693195-scaledOn June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for more than 350,000 people from Haiti and Syria who have been legally living and working in the United States.

Although the ruling directly affects only TPS holders from Haiti and Syria, its impact could reach much further.

The decision may have consequences for the broader TPS program, which currently protects about 1.3 million people from more than a dozen countries.

What is TPS

Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a temporary immigration protection that allows people from certain countries to live and work legally in the United States, when it is unsafe for them to return home because of conditions like war, natural disasters, or major political instability.

The federal government determines which countries qualify for TPS and decides whether conditions in those countries justify renewing their designation.

The Ruling

The case, Mullin v. Doe, written by Justice Alito, held that courts do not have authority to review an administration’s decision to terminate TPS for a particular country. The court also rejected a constitutional claim brought by Haitian TPS holders, who argued that Haiti’s designation was ended because of racial bias. The court found that the evidence was not enough to show that racism played a motivating role in the decision.

Continue reading

by

joseph-chan-Q-730ajUcQ-unsplash-1-scaledFor years, DACA gave hundreds of thousands of young immigrants a fragile kind of security: permission to work, build lives, and avoid deportation — at least temporarily.

That security just got weaker.

On April 24, 2026, the Justice Department’s Board of Immigration Appeals issued a new precedent decision saying that DACA status alone is not enough to end deportation proceedings. The case involved Catalina “Xóchitl” Santiago, a DACA recipient whose removal case had been terminated by an immigration judge because her DACA protection was still active. DHS appealed — and won.

Continue reading

by

tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash-scaledThe Trump administration has fired additional U.S. immigration judges, including two who recently blocked deportation efforts involving pro-Palestinian university students, according to a Reuters report.

The dismissals are part of a broader wave of removals within the immigration court system, which has already seen more than 100 judges fired since January 2025. The move reflects an ongoing effort to reshape the immigration judiciary by replacing experienced judges with those more aligned with hard-line immigration enforcement.

Among those dismissed were judges Roopal Patel and Nina Froes, both of whom were appointed during the Biden administration and were still within their probationary periods. They had recently issued rulings halting deportation proceedings in high-profile student cases.

Continue reading

by

mohamed_hassan-police-9844768_1280

A tragic case out of South Florida is raising serious concerns for teens pulled into the tight grip of immigration enforcement. A 19-year-old Mexican national, Royer Perez-Jimenez, recently died while in ICE custody at a detention facility, with early reports pointing to a possible suicide. The incident is still under investigation, but it highlights ongoing concerns about conditions inside immigration detention centers.

His death marks the youngest reported in ICE custody during President Trump’s second term and adds to a growing number of detainee deaths nationwide. At least 36 people have died in ICE custody since January 2025, continuing an alarming trend.

In light of this tragedy, the Mexican government has called for a thorough investigation, emphasizing concerns over detainee safety and accountability. Meanwhile, longstanding issues within detention centers persist, including reports of poor conditions, inadequate medical care, and the psychological toll of prolonged detention.

ICE maintains that detainees are held in safe and humane conditions and receive appropriate medical care. However, the increasing number of deaths continues to fuel public scrutiny, with calls for greater oversight and systemic reform.

Continue reading

by

graphicmama-team-detective-1424831_1280

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is seeking to gain access to a federal database designed to track child support payments—a move that could expand the government’s ability to locate individuals for immigration enforcement.

According to reporting by ProPublica, officials have discussed whether DHS could obtain information from the Federal Parent Locator Service, a system maintained by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The system helps states locate parents who owe child support.

One part of the system, the National Directory of New Hires, collects employment data reported by employers across the United States. The database includes wage and employment information for millions of workers.

Officials familiar with the discussions said DHS is evaluating whether this information could help immigration authorities locate undocumented immigrants. Although the database does not contain immigration status information, employment records could potentially help identify individuals’ locations.

Continue reading

by
54234938168_663c4a24e3_c

Source: Flickr Creative Commons Attribution Gage Skidmore

On March 5, 2026, President Donald Trump announced the firing of Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary and nominated Senator Markwayne Mullin to take her place at the helm of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Noem’s tenure had been controversial, drawing bipartisan scrutiny over hardline immigration enforcement tactics including the deaths of U.S. Citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti, as well as internal management issues at DHS. Her replacement reflects not just a personnel change but a continuation of the administration’s approach to immigration and border security.

Mullin, an Oklahoma Republican with a decade of legislative experience and close ties to Trump, brings to the role a firm commitment to strict immigration enforcement. Although some hoped the shake-up might bring a softer approach to immigration, most signs point to continuity, with Mullin expected to maintain the administration’s focus on border security and strict enforcement.

Continue reading

Contact Information
1502 6th Ave
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619.819.9204
Fax: 619.393.0467
Email: info@h1b.biz

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Law Offices of Jacob J. Sapochnick
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design