Visa Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in White House

by

marek-studzinski-vUIUHWK3LFc-unsplash-scaledThe cost of sponsoring an H-1B worker could soon change dramatically.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a new $103,265 fee for H-1B cap-subject petitions—on top of the government filing fees employers already pay.

The proposal was published in the Federal Register on August 25, 2026.

Who Would Have to Pay?

The proposed six-figure fee would apply to H-1B petitions subject to the annual cap, including beneficiaries selected under the 20,000-visa U.S. advanced degree exemption.

Importantly, the fee would apply whether the petition requests:

  • Change of status inside the United States; or
  • Consular notification for an H-1B visa abroad.

The $103,265 payment would be due when the employer files the H-1B petition—not during the initial H-1B registration process.

Who Would Not Be Affected?

The proposal is limited to cap-subject cases.

Cap-exempt H-1B petitions would not be subject to the new fee. This generally includes H-1B extensions and qualifying petitions filed by cap-exempt organizations, such as certain universities, nonprofit research organizations, and governmental research organizations.

Continue reading

by

blessing-ri-mBRtqyC_Iq0-unsplash-scaled

We are pleased to report that the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has published the September 2026 Visa Bulletin.

In this blog post, we breakdown the movement of the employment-based and family-sponsored categories in the coming month.

Adjustment of Status Chart

For adjustment of status filings to permanent residence in the month of September, USCIS will continue using the Dates for Filing Chart for family-sponsored categories only.

For employment-based categories, USCIS will also continue using the Final Action Dates Chart.

Highlights of the September 2026 Visa Bulletin

At a Glance

What can we expect to see in the month of September?

Employment-Based Categories

Final Action Advancements

  • No changes except for EB-4 which will advance 2 months to December 15, 2022
  • EB-2 India and EB-5 India remain unavailable
  • The State Department warns that the EB-2, EB-1 India, and EB-5 unreserved categories may become unavailable before the end of September, with availability resuming when the new fiscal year starts in October.

Dates for Filing Advancements

  • No changes from August Visa Bulletin

Family-Sponsored Categories

Final Action Advancements

F-1 Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens

  • Mexico will advance 1 month to January 1, 2008
  • Worldwide, China, and India will advance 13 months to January 22, 2020

F-2A Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents

  • Mexico will advance 1 month to August 22, 2025
  • All other countries will advance 1 month to August 22, 2026

F-2B Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents

  • Worldwide, China, India will advance 1 year and 7 months to August 22, 2019

Continue reading

by

kreatikar-globe-3411506_1280-1On August 21, 2026, a federal judge struck down the Trump administration policy that blocked immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries, allowing the green card process to resume for thousands of family- and employment-based green card applicants.

The policy, which took effect in January 2026, directed U.S. consulates to pause immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries identified by the State Department as presenting a higher risk of relying on public benefits.

These countries included:

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.

Although applicants could continue submitting documents and attending interviews, many could not actually receive their immigrant visas solely because of their nationality.

Continue reading

by

rainbowart-hat-1217913_1920The Trump administration is reportedly considering a $100,000 fee for international students who want to remain in the United States and work after graduating from an American university.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the proposal is being discussed within the Department of Homeland Security but has not been formally approved or published as a proposed regulation. Important details—including whether the student, university, or employer would pay the fee—remain unresolved.

The fee would affect students seeking employment through Optional Practical Training, commonly known as OPT. The program allows eligible F-1 students to obtain temporary employment directly related to their field of study. Standard post-completion OPT generally lasts up to 12 months, while qualifying STEM graduates may receive an additional 24-month extension.

A $100,000 charge would dramatically increase the cost of remaining in the United States after graduation. It could discourage international students from attending American universities and make it more difficult for employers in technology, finance, research, and other specialized industries to recruit graduates.

The reported proposal follows broader changes to student immigration policy, including new fixed periods of admission and extension requirements for certain F-1 students. DHS has acknowledged that international students contribute to American universities, research, innovation, and local economies, while maintaining that additional restrictions are needed to improve oversight and prevent fraud.

Continue reading

by

yamu_jay-ai-generated-8998390-scaledThe Department of Homeland Security has issued a final rule ending the longstanding practice of admitting certain foreign nationals for “duration of status,” commonly shown as D/S on Form I-94.

The rule is scheduled to take effect on September 15, 2026. Because it is classified as a major rule subject to congressional review, DHS will publish another notice if Congress changes the rule or its effective date.

Who Is Affected?

The rule applies to:

  • F visa holders: International students and their dependents;
  • J visa holders: Exchange visitors and their dependents; and
  • I visa holders: Representatives of foreign information media and their dependents.

What Is Changing?

F, J, and I visa holders have traditionally been allowed to remain in the United States while they continued their authorized studies, exchange programs, practical training, or media assignments.

Under the new rule:

  • Form I-94 will contain a specific expiration date;
  • An updated Form I-20 or Form DS-2019 will not automatically extend a person’s authorized stay;
  • Individuals who need additional time must generally apply for an extension with USCIS; and
  • USCIS may require biometrics as part of the extension process.

Continue reading

by

ai-generated-8051223_1280The Department of Homeland Security has proposed sweeping new regulations that could significantly reshape the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.

Published on July 2, 2026, the proposed rule seeks to formally implement many of the changes Congress enacted through the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 while introducing stricter compliance, enforcement, fraud-prevention, and national-security requirements.

Importantly, this is only a proposed rule. It is not yet final, and the proposed changes have not automatically taken effect. DHS is accepting public comments through August 31, 2026, before deciding whether to issue a final regulation.

What Is the EB-5 Investor Visa Program?

The EB-5 program offers qualifying foreign investors a pathway to lawful permanent residence by investing capital in a U.S. business that creates at least 10 full-time jobs for qualifying U.S. workers.

The current minimum investment is generally:

  • $1,050,000 for a standard EB-5 investment; or
  • $800,000 for an investment in a targeted employment area or qualifying infrastructure project.

Targeted employment areas include certain rural locations and areas experiencing high unemployment. Investors may invest directly in their own commercial enterprise or through a USCIS-designated regional center.

New Investment Amount for High-Employment Areas

One of the most significant provisions would establish a separate investment amount for projects located in areas with particularly low unemployment.

DHS proposes requiring an investment of $1.4 million for projects principally doing business in a defined “high-employment area.” Under the proposal, this would generally include certain metropolitan areas where unemployment is significantly below the national average.

The standard, targeted-area, infrastructure, and high-employment investment amounts would be adjusted for inflation beginning January 1, 2027, and every five years afterward.

Continue reading

by

brittani-burns-98uYQ-KupiE-unsplash-scaled

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court terminated Haiti and Syria’s TPS status on June 25th
  • Approximately, 350,000 individuals will lose their work authorization and be subject to removal
  • Affected individuals must seek alternative legal status immediately to avoid removal proceedings once the transition period ends.

On July 1, 2026, DHS and USCIS set a temporary expiration date of July 10, 2026 for work permits held by Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries from seven countries (Haiti, Syria, Burma, Yemen, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Somalia), after a Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for the government to end those protections.

On June 25th the Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can move forward with ending TPS for certain countries specifically Haiti and Syria even while other smaller legal battles about those terminations continue in lower courts.

Although the deadline for some countries could still be extended while lower court cases continue, DHS has described any continued relief as temporary.

Continue reading

by

ralphs_fotos-banner-3585161-scaledOn June 30, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected President Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship, ruling that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present in the country are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The 6-3 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, marks a major ruling on the meaning of American citizenship and the limits of executive power in immigration policy.

The case, Trump v. Barbara, centered on Executive Order 14160, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.”

The order sought to deny automatic U.S. citizenship to certain children born in the United States if neither parent was a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Specifically, it targeted children born to mothers who were either unlawfully present or lawfully present on a temporary basis, such as on a student, work, or tourist visa, when the father was not a U.S. citizen or green card holder.

The Supreme Court held that the executive order violated the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That clause provides that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States and of the state where they reside. The Court concluded that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are still “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore are citizens at birth.

Continue reading

by

succo-hammer-1675156_1280In another rapid development surrounding the controversial $100,000 H-1B consular processing fee, a federal court has temporarily allowed U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to continue collecting the fee while the government’s appeal moves forward.

Employers and foreign workers should prepare for continued uncertainty as the litigation unfolds.

What Happened?

On June 8, 2026, a federal district court in Massachusetts struck down USCIS’s implementation of the $100,000 H-1B fee, finding significant legal issues with the policy. However, just four days later, on June 12, 2026, the same court temporarily paused its ruling after the government filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

As a result, USCIS currently retains the authority to continue collecting the $100,000 fee for qualifying H-1B petitions involving consular notification while the appellate court reviews the case.

The government must formally request a stay from the First Circuit by June 18, 2026, for the temporary reinstatement to remain in effect.

The appeal is pending in State of California, et al. v. Mullin, et al., No. 26-1699 (1st Cir. June 12, 2026).

Continue reading

by

artsybeekids-capitol-5660507-scaledThe U.S. Senate has approved legislation providing approximately $70 billion in additional funding for immigration enforcement, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Border Patrol. The measure passed by a 52-47 vote and now moves to the House of Representatives.

The bill significantly expands the administration’s immigration enforcement capabilities and provides substantial resources for detention, deportation, and border security operations through the remainder of President Trump’s term.

A major point of controversy was the bill’s inclusion of a $1.8 billion settlement fund connected to President Trump’s lawsuit over the disclosure of his tax records. Efforts to eliminate or restrict the fund failed, and the Senate ultimately passed the legislation without placing limits on how the money may be distributed.

The legislation marks one of the largest investments in federal immigration enforcement in recent years and reflects the administration’s continued focus on expanding immigration enforcement nationwide.

Continue reading