Whenever you hear about H-1B visa, you hear the term “specialty occupation”.

So, what does “specialty occupation” mean? Why is it important to prove that the proposed position is a “specialty occupation” in order to qualify for the H-1B? What role does the Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) published by the Department of Labor play in USCIS’ interpretation of “specialty occupation”?

This article will address these questions and other common issues that H-1B candidates and practicing immigration attorneys face in context of H-1B filings.

In an effort to fight fraud and abuse in the L1 and H1B programs, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is implementing a program known as Validation Instrument for Business Enterprises (VIBE). VIBE is a web-based tool that will allow the USCIS to corroborate certain basic information about a company during adjudication of employment-based visa petitions. Use of this program is becoming evident in the content of requests for evidence (RFEs). See example below from one of our cases.

Vibe rfe

View more documents from usvisalaw.

USCIS procedures allow for the employer to explain or clarify any concerns regarding information contained in VIBE. If information collected through the VIBE program reveals inconsistencies with the employer’s petition, or raises other concerns regarding the case, the USCIS should issue an RFE or notice of intent to deny (NOID) to allow for a response, rather than directly denying the case. The RFE or NOID will clearly note that that the VIBE program has found missing or contradictory information and provide a description of this information. The petitioning employer will then have the ability to address these issues.

Major defeat for Anti Immigration supporters. The Ninth Circuit upheld today a lower court’s block of much of Arizona’s controversial SB 1070 law aimed at illegal immigration. A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the lower court “did not abuse its discretion” in blocking parts of the law from taking effect last year.

The decision, a victory for the Obama administration and immigration activists who filed suit to block the law, means the SB 1070 case will likely find its way to the Supreme Court. The judges agreed with U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton, who issued a preliminary injunction in July preventing sections of SB 1070 from being enforced.

From the ruling:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced it continues to accept H-1B nonimmigrant petitions that are subject to the fiscal year (FY) 2012 cap. The agency began accepting these petitions on April 1, 2011.

USCIS is monitoring the number of petitions received that count toward the congressionally mandated annual H-1B cap of 65,000 and the 20,000 U.S. master’s degree or higher cap exemption. USCIS has received approximately 5,900 H-1B petitions counting toward the 65,000 cap, and approximately 4,500 petitions toward the 20,000 cap exemption for individuals with advanced degrees.

With all the hype, hysteria and hot air generated around the H1-B visa program issue during the past several years, one fundamental truism remains: the current annual level of H-1B visas being utilized in the United States is about the same level as in 1990.

Many readers were emailing us for an update on the Visa Waiver overstay saga. Here is the latest: Our Lawyer’s Association and all fellow attorneys are concerned that USCIS has not yet provided guidance to the field with respect to the eligibility of an alien who was admitted under the Visa Waiver Program (“VWP”) to adjust status as an immediate relative under INA § 245 at any time prior to the removal of the alien under INA § 217.

Several USCIS District Offices are holding in abeyance immediate relative adjustment of status applications by applicants who entered under the Visa Waiver Program and whose VWP 90-day admission expired prior to the filing of the Form I-485, and at least one district here in San Diego continues to deny such cases.

The Solicitor General has acknowledged the adjustment eligibility of an alien admitted under the VWP in a brief in opposition to certiorari filed in Bradley v. Holder, Case No. 10-397

It has been 5 days now since the H1B season started and there is no indication whether the H1B Cap was reached on the first day or not. The stakes are higher this year as the economy rebounds.

According to computer world, some law makers think that the cap should be increased to certain industries and keep other out of the game.

A top Republican lawmaker, U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Thursday said the H-1B visa plays a “vital role” in the economy and thus its cap should be increased.

Charlie Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Visa Control and Reporting Division, U.S. Department of State, informed previously of a dramatic reduction in the use of EB-1 numbers.

He stated:

“[US]CIS says they have seen a decline in filings, and does not expect a change in the number use pattern. Therefore, this decline in EB-1 number use will allow me to begin having those ‘otherwise unused’ numbers drop down and be available for use in the EB-2 category. Based on current indications, that would mean that at least 12,000 additional numbers will be available to the EB-2 category. This situation will allow me to advance the India EB-2 cut-off date for May. The reason being that all ‘otherwise unused’ numbers are provided strictly in priority date order, and the India demand has the largest concentration of early dates.”

This system started in late March. This is an initiative that allows individuals in the United States to check their employment eligibility information without charge.

The self check allows individuals to become aware of any inaccuracies in their records. The workers can address incorrect information and seek to resolve any mismatches or inconsistencies before applying for jobs. Most employers are not required to utilize the E-Verify system, however, participation by employers is becoming more common.

There are 4 steps in the system: entry of biographic information by the user; confirmation of identity; entry of work eligibility information such as Social Security number or Alien Registration number; and receipt of employment eligibility information based on the information found in the databases of the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

On August 18, 2010 we were the first to report the new trend coming from some local Immigration offices, mainly San Diego, regarding Visa Waiver overstay Issues. Click here to read the post as well as the Adjustment of Status denial we posted that same week.

We are happy to report that we were able to overturn the Appeal denial of that same case a few weeks ago, making this one of the only visa waivers approvals since this new policy started in July. While this is a small victory for us and our clients, the Visa Waiver overstay denial policy still continues in San Diego at this time.

Due to some of publicity efforts, National Public Radio and KPBS covered this story this morning, click here to listen online.

We has learned that the USCIS hold on adjudication of cases involving same-sex partners has been lifted. An announcement by immigration officials in Washington on Monday that they were delaying decisions on some immigration cases involving gay couples led to a surge of expectations among gay advocates that the Obama administration had taken a small but significant step toward recognizing same-sex marriage.

But now, immigration officials moved swiftly to clarify their position and dampen those hopes, saying they have not made any policy changes that would provide an opening to gay couples. The episode added to the legal confusion that has followed the administration’s determination last month that the law that bars the federal government from recognizing gay marriages, the Defense of Marriage Act, is unconstitutional.

According to Immigration Equality Memo released today, until DOMA is repealed or until there is a final court decision, it is the obligation of the Executive branch to comply with and enforce the law.  Recent statements by DHS re‐iterate this enforcement message; therefore, if a USC or LPR files an I‐130 immigrant visa petition on behalf of his or her partner, it will be denied.