Visa Lawyer Blog

by

As part of our commitment to our international clients, we also provide global Immigration services in many cases. In this article, we will cover the Australian Same Sex Immigration options. Unlike the united States, Australia offers many benefits to same sex couples.

Australia now has two different partner visa subclasses: the spouse visa and prospective marriage (fiancée) visa. The spouse visa subclass is available to couples who are married and to couples who are in a de facto relationship. Couples who are in a de facto relationship include same sex partners. This change occurred in 2009.

Because of this change, same sex partners in a de facto relationship can enter and remain permanently in Australia. Of great note, U.S. immigration law does not afford similar rights to same sex partners of U.S. citizens and permanent residents immigrating to the U.S.

Continue reading

by

Can you own your company as an H1B Holder? Attorney Ekaterina Powell from our office has prepared the summary of the updates regarding establishing employer-employee relationship for H-1B purposes in cases where the beneficiary owns 100% of the petitioning company.

Since the issuance of Neufeld Memorandum “Determining Employer-Employee Relationship for Adjudication of H-1B Petitions, Including Third-Party Placements” in January 2010, USCIS has issued Requests for Evidence (RFEs) for many companies where the beneficiary is also a stockholder of the petitioning company. Often times, the RFEs are issued even if the beneficiary owns a minimal percentage of shares in the petitioning company.

In the situations where the beneficiary has an ownership interest in the petitioning company, it has to be established that the petitioner can be classified as the employer pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h) (4) (ii) (2). In other words, it has to be established that there will be an “employer-employee relationship”, as indicated by the fact that the petitioner may hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise exercise the right to control over any such employee.

Continue reading

by

Today, the House Judiciary Committee held a markup and H.R. 3012 was reported favorably out of committee by a voice vote. An amendment from Rep. Lofgren (D-CA) that would make adjustments to the three year phase-in period was accepted. H.R. 3012 must next be scheduled for House floor debate which may occur in the next few weeks. We will update as soon as more information becomes available.

H.R. 3012, the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, introduced on September 22, 2011 by Rep. Chaffetz (R-UT), eliminates the employment-based per-country cap entirely by fiscal year 2013 and raises the family-sponsored per-country cap from 7% to 15%. We will keep you posted!!!

by

Several of our clients who attended recent Visa Stamping for H1B and L1A visas were pulled for Administrative Processing. Our recent case delays are coming from India (Delhi), Mexico (Tijuana), and Russia (Moscow).

The clients were told the same story in all cases:” Your case was selected for Administrative Processing, go home and we will contact you shortly”. In a recent American Immigration Lawyers Association meeting with the State Department, the issue was raised and we have some information to update.

Question: When questioned on reasons for delays in visa issuance, 62.2% of our members responding to our survey answered that it was due to administrative processing. We understand that there is no timeline for these cases to be processed, but at our last meeting, it was discovered that some cases had been resolved, and the applicant or attorney was not notified. Have there been steps taken to ensure applicants and/or their attorneys are indeed notified when their cases have cleared? Some posts, including Chennai, have real time case status reports available on their website. Are there any plans to institute such case status reports at other posts or worldwide?

Continue reading

by

Last week I attended the EB5 Investor Visa conference for Immigration Lawyers held in San Antonio Texas. Top lawyers from across the nation gathered to discuss the latest developments and updates in this exciting area of law. In the next few weeks, we will share some info obtained on this Blog in a series of articles.

EB5 Investors come from select few countries, mainly China, Iran, Korea, Brazil and Russia. In this article we will cover specific issues relating to Russian Investors. The following article is based on an AILA report by Mr. Kenneth White.

What is EB5 Investor Visa?

Continue reading

by

With the recent announcement that Illegal immigrants can now apply for state-financed scholarships and aid at state universities after Gov. Jerry Brown announced that he had signed the second half of a legislative package focused on such students, we wanted to share some facts on such students.

This is a guest article by Carol Brown from onlinecollege.org

Families immigrate to the United States constantly, and many of them bring children along with them. Immigrant adults with dubious legal status have it bad enough, but their kids face even more difficulty, unable to achieve their dreams in a country they consider home. About 65,000 undocumented students graduate from U.S. high schools every year, and their presence is not insignificant. Although they are guaranteed a public school education through grade 12, their future in college is much less certain. From federal Financial Aid restrictions to reduced opportunities, students with undocumented status face a lower quality of education and future careers than their legal classmates. Read on, and we’ll explore several important facts about their experiences in the United States.

Continue reading

by

We all have been reading about The Obama administration changing the federal immigration enforcement strategy, in ways that reduce the threat of deportation for millions of illegal immigrants.

The changes focus enforcement on immigrants who have committed serious crimes, an effort to unclog immigration courts and detention centers. A record backlog of deportation cases has forced immigrants to wait an average 459 days for their hearings. But recent statistics paint a slightly different picture.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton said today his agency deported nearly 400,000 individuals during the fiscal year that ended in September, the largest number of removals in the agency’s history.

Continue reading

by

As lawyers specializing in the H2B visa process, we wanted to share the following update. The Department of Labor (DOL) is now issuing two prevailing wage determinations (PWD) for H-2B cases. Since last week we have received new PWDs with the following message attached:

On January 19, 2011, the Department published a Final Rule that revised the methodology by which the Department calculates prevailing wages under the H-2B program. On August 1, 2011 the Department amended that rule to make wage rates established under this new methodology effective for wages paid to H–2B workers and U.S. workers recruited in connection with an H–2B labor certification for all work performed on or after September 30, 2011. However, on September 28, 2011, the Department announced in the Federal Register a 60-day postponement of the effective date of the Wage Final Rule to November 30, 2011. This delay will permit the various courts involved in litigation relating to the Wage Final Rule to determine the appropriate venue to resolve all claims and to allow the Department to avoid the possibility of administering the H-2B program under potentially conflicting court orders.

As a result of the pending court actions and the delay imposed by the Department, you are now receiving two Prevailing Wage Determinations; attached please find the second of two. The wage listed on this Form ETA 9141 is for work performed until November 29, 2011. The National Prevailing Wage Center has already issued to you an ETA Form 9141 that is based upon the Wage Final Rule, which will, by virtue of that delay in the effective date, apply to work that is to be performed on or after November 30, 2011, unless a new effective date is established in connection with the pending court actions.

Continue reading

by

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta ruled that Alabama cannot prosecute illegal immigrants for not carrying registration documents with them at all times or require schools to check the immigration status of all students.

But the court said Alabama, among other things, can require police officers to verify the immigration status of anyone they lawfully stop if they suspect they are in the country illegally. Illegal immigrants will also be prohibited from obtaining a license to drive, get a vehicle or open a business.

Alabama’s law, passed by the legislature this summer, would allow state and local officials to check the immigration status of public school students and to detain suspected undocumented immigrants without bond. It would make it a crime for immigrants who lack proper documents to conduct business with the state for things such as driver’s licenses.

Continue reading

by

On Sunday, October 9th, 2011 Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1236, the Employment Acceleration Act authored by Assemblymember Paul Fong (D-Cupertino). The bill ensures that it prohibits the state, cities or counties from requiring employers to use E-Verify, an electronic employment verification system that uses employees’ social security numbers to determine work eligibility. Exceptions are made, however, for city or county workers, or if E-verify is a requirement for particular employers under federal or as a condition for employers receiving federal funds.

While supporters of mandatory E-Verify claim the system will magically open up millions of jobs to American workers, reports find that the program would actually cost California’s small businesses (which make up 99% of employers in the state) more than $312 million per year and potentially put 90,000 U.S. citizen and legal state workers out of a job. Nationally, mandatory E-Verify would cost small businesses $2.6 billion a year, according to Bloomberg News Service, and cost federal contractors $10 billion to implement. According to Assemblyman Paul Fong, AB 1236’s sponsor:

“This bill protects our California workers and businesses. The mandated use of E-Verify would impose a major financial burden on businesses, especially small businesses. In addition, businesses will suffer from delayed hiring and the cost of mistaken identities. In this tough economy, we need to help businesses and grow and provide jobs, not set up barriers that cost jobs.”

Continue reading