Heading into Veterans Day, the Senate unanimously passed a bill to help unemployed veterans seeking jobs as well as federal contractors facing a new tax burden in 2013.
As we observe Veterans day, We wanted to send warm wards of support to our Veterans and the active duty men and women fighting for our country day and night.
The P1 Visa is for Internationally recognized athletes or athletic teams entering the U.S. to participate in an event of international standing. The B1 Visa is for Professional athletes to compete for tournament money and not for a salary among other things. Department of Homeland Security reserves B-1 visas for non-contracted players who are coming to training camp to try out. In reality, many players entering the U.S. with a standard contracts on a B1, even though it violates the letter of the law. The B-1 can cost up to $1,550 less than the P-1.
Chad Starling hopes something will change, and that he’s the last ECHL player who gets turned around at the U.S.-Canadian border because he doesn’t have the proper work visa.
ECHL commissioner Brian McKenna said if something does change, it will be up to the member teams. He’s comfortable with the league’s immigration policy as it currently stands.
To qualify for an H-1B visa foreign nationals must have the a U.S. Bachelor’s Degree or its equivalent in their specialty and, in fields that require licensing, such as teaching or pharmacy, a full unrestricted license to practice in the U.S. You must also have a U.S. employer to sponsor you; you cannot be self-employed or self-petitioned.
Thus, if you wish to come to the U.S. on an H-1B specialty occupation visa, and all your degrees are foreign degrees, you will need your educational credentials evaluated and submit that evaluation with the H-1B petition.
At a recent meeting between AILA and USCIS officials, the following issue came up: We request that Service Center Operations Director advise on how the Service treats foreign degrees, for equivalency purposes, if the programs were structured differently at the time
Recently, many employers have been receiving Requests for Evidence (RFEs) on their petitions for L-1B Specialized Knowledge nonimmigrant worker visa. The L-1B visa is filed by a company who wants to transfer someone with specialized knowledge of the company or product of the company to their U.S. branch to help with its operations. Because of so many RFEs sent to employers on their L-1B petitions, the United States Citizen and Immigration Services held a stakeholder meeting to address the issues related to L-1B filings. In particular, many attorneys for employers raised the issue concerning the factors in determining Specialized Knowledge. At our law firm, we received an RFE for our own L-1B case that raised many of the same issues other attorneys have faced in their filings. This article will address those issues and how we overcame them in our case.
The main issue being the L-1B visa is the specialized knowledge requirement. Specialized knowledge means special knowledge possessed by an individual of the petitioning organization’s product, service, research, equipment, techniques, management or other interests and its application in international markets, or an advanced level of knowledge or expertise in the organization’s processes and procedures (8 C.F.R. 214.2(l)(1)(ii)(D and (E)). From this definition of specialized knowledge, the application of it has varied greatly in many cases. First, what constitutes special knowledge seems to be confused with the standard of the O-1 visa requirements. The O-1 visa requires the individual to hold extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics where “extraordinary ability” means sustaining national or international acclaim. This standard confuses the meaning of someone simply having an advanced level of knowledge or expertise within their organization’s processes and procedures.
In answering how our client’s employee held the specialized knowledge for the position he was being transferred to, we had to go back through the description of the position held in the foreign company and the position going to be held in the U.S. After going through those descriptions, we responded to each duty in both positions to show how the specialized knowledge of the employee was required for both positions. We further confirmed that knowledge through use of many letters of reference from higher up executives and other individuals who recognized the employee’s importance within the organization.
There has been some indication that specialized knowledge is different from proprietary knowledge and should not be confused. Some attorneys reminded USCIS that the L-1B nonimmigrant classification did not require the individual to be extraordinary, and that specialized knowledge need not be proprietary. It has pointed out that specialized knowledge is a special knowledge of the product or processes of a company. It was also stated that specialized knowledge need not to be narrowly held by a select few individuals within a company. These concerns were raised in our own case wherein it was requested to show how the employee held proprietary knowledge of the company’s product. Although there is nothing in the definition of the L-1B visa that says proprietary knowledge is required to show specialized knowledge, nevertheless, by providing other documentation to show how the employee was directly involved in the development of the company’s product, it was indisputable that he held specialized knowledge within the company.
Another issue raised was that skilled individuals required to keep the company competitive in the field were becoming difficult to bring over with RFEs in these cases. In cases where the knowledge relates to the industry rather than a particular company or it is not unique to the company, but rather enhances a company’s competitiveness, the importance of the individual’s skilled work cannot be understated. It was noted that in certain industries such as the software industry, the information is not unique to the company in that there are other individuals who have knowledge of the software as well. All of these considerations make it clear that a specialized knowledge individual is the one whose knowledge makes the company more competitive in its field. This RFE was also asked for in our case and easily responded to through statements from the senior executives of the company attesting to how the employee’s use in the U.S. will make the company more competitive.
We have been reporting on the increase in unjust H1B denials for weeks. In many cases applicants and their lawyers are left with the option to appeal or refile. But when the media gets involved, USCIS are forced to change course.
Earlier this week “World News” shared the story of Amit Aharoni, an Israeli national and a graduate of Stanford Business School, who secured $1.65 million in venture capital funding with two cofounders to launch CruiseWise.com, an online cruise booking company. The company hired nine Americans in just one year.
But Aharoni hit rough waters after he received a letter on Oct. 4 from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denying his request for a visa and notifying him that he needed to leave the country immediately. Aharoni moved to Canada, where he was forced to run his company via Skype from a friend’s living room. While “World News’ viewers voiced their disappointment, this morning, Aharoni received an email from USCIS. He was told that his petition had been reconsidered and approved. He is once again able to work in the U.S.
So the race for H1b Visas is on. As of October 28, 2011, USCIS received approximately 49,200 H-1B petitions counting towards the congressionally mandated 65,000 limit. USCIS also confirmed that it has received approximately 20,000 H-1B petitions for employees with advanced degrees from U.S. colleges and universities.
The annual limit on H-1B petitions in the advanced degree category is 20,000. Accordingly, USCIS is still accepting H-1B petitions under the general cap. Employees with advanced degrees from U.S. colleges and universities may still apply under the general cap.
The H-1B numbers are being used at a faster rate this year than they were last year. In October 2010, USCIS had received approximately 45,600 H-1B petitions counting towards the congressionally mandated 65,000 limit and approximately 16,700 H-1B petitions for employees with advanced degrees from U.S. colleges and universities.
As part of our commitment to our international clients, we also provide global Immigration services in many cases. In this article, we will cover the Australian Same Sex Immigration options. Unlike the united States, Australia offers many benefits to same sex couples.
Australia now has two different partner visa subclasses: the spouse visa and prospective marriage (fiancée) visa. The spouse visa subclass is available to couples who are married and to couples who are in a de facto relationship. Couples who are in a de facto relationship include same sex partners. This change occurred in 2009.
Because of this change, same sex partners in a de facto relationship can enter and remain permanently in Australia. Of great note, U.S. immigration law does not afford similar rights to same sex partners of U.S. citizens and permanent residents immigrating to the U.S.
Can you own your company as an H1B Holder? Attorney Ekaterina Powell from our office has prepared the summary of the updates regarding establishing employer-employee relationship for H-1B purposes in cases where the beneficiary owns 100% of the petitioning company.
Since the issuance of Neufeld Memorandum “Determining Employer-Employee Relationship for Adjudication of H-1B Petitions, Including Third-Party Placements” in January 2010, USCIS has issued Requests for Evidence (RFEs) for many companies where the beneficiary is also a stockholder of the petitioning company. Often times, the RFEs are issued even if the beneficiary owns a minimal percentage of shares in the petitioning company.
In the situations where the beneficiary has an ownership interest in the petitioning company, it has to be established that the petitioner can be classified as the employer pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h) (4) (ii) (2). In other words, it has to be established that there will be an “employer-employee relationship”, as indicated by the fact that the petitioner may hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise exercise the right to control over any such employee.
Today, the House Judiciary Committee held a markup and H.R. 3012 was reported favorably out of committee by a voice vote. An amendment from Rep. Lofgren (D-CA) that would make adjustments to the three year phase-in period was accepted. H.R. 3012 must next be scheduled for House floor debate which may occur in the next few weeks. We will update as soon as more information becomes available.
H.R. 3012, the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, introduced on September 22, 2011 by Rep. Chaffetz (R-UT), eliminates the employment-based per-country cap entirely by fiscal year 2013 and raises the family-sponsored per-country cap from 7% to 15%. We will keep you posted!!!
Several of our clients who attended recent Visa Stamping for H1B and L1A visas were pulled for Administrative Processing. Our recent case delays are coming from India (Delhi), Mexico (Tijuana), and Russia (Moscow).
The clients were told the same story in all cases:” Your case was selected for Administrative Processing, go home and we will contact you shortly”. In a recent American Immigration Lawyers Association meeting with the State Department, the issue was raised and we have some information to update.
Question: When questioned on reasons for delays in visa issuance, 62.2% of our members responding to our survey answered that it was due to administrative processing. We understand that there is no timeline for these cases to be processed, but at our last meeting, it was discovered that some cases had been resolved, and the applicant or attorney was not notified. Have there been steps taken to ensure applicants and/or their attorneys are indeed notified when their cases have cleared? Some posts, including Chennai, have real time case status reports available on their website. Are there any plans to institute such case status reports at other posts or worldwide?
Visa Lawyer Blog